upsilon
Senior
- Aug 20, 2002
- 372
- 2
Amen, E-- (Fomer Mod), Amen! They are my three priorities also. In my opinion anyone who doesn't put all of them first hasn't much of a claim to being a "Real Man'.
I wonder if a single-Mother could or would claim to be 'Real Woman' if she allowed her children to become homeless and underfed because she 'stood up for her principles'?
Just as the concept of the need for trade unions at all, the term 'scab' has lost its cachet and is relatively meaningless to the general public. And, as unionism declines, the 'once-a-scab/always-a-scab' lists become less a threat. When balanced against family priorities and obligations, the word becomes meaningless.
Of course, the die-hard unionists will disagree; but collectively they are a rapidly diminishing group-think breed. And I attribute it to the same complaints of the anti-TWU and anti-IAM posters: their leaders are interested only in dues and their own perks.
I'm old enough to remember John L. Lewis and his modest home in Alexandria and the spartan UMW offices in D.C. I was then an employer consultant in negotiations with UMW District 50, a catch-all for non-mineworker Locals.
It is over 50 years later. Unions are always a "threat"; but one that enlightened management can avoid. And unions can't be "busted" by management alone; but they can be eliminated by their own actions or by being voted off the property. It seems to me that the AMT are assisting NW in union 'busting' by their own actions.
I wonder if a single-Mother could or would claim to be 'Real Woman' if she allowed her children to become homeless and underfed because she 'stood up for her principles'?
Just as the concept of the need for trade unions at all, the term 'scab' has lost its cachet and is relatively meaningless to the general public. And, as unionism declines, the 'once-a-scab/always-a-scab' lists become less a threat. When balanced against family priorities and obligations, the word becomes meaningless.
Of course, the die-hard unionists will disagree; but collectively they are a rapidly diminishing group-think breed. And I attribute it to the same complaints of the anti-TWU and anti-IAM posters: their leaders are interested only in dues and their own perks.
I'm old enough to remember John L. Lewis and his modest home in Alexandria and the spartan UMW offices in D.C. I was then an employer consultant in negotiations with UMW District 50, a catch-all for non-mineworker Locals.
It is over 50 years later. Unions are always a "threat"; but one that enlightened management can avoid. And unions can't be "busted" by management alone; but they can be eliminated by their own actions or by being voted off the property. It seems to me that the AMT are assisting NW in union 'busting' by their own actions.