Numbers?
- Thread starter Hopeful
- Start date
NewHampshire Black Bears
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 10,154
- 681
Hopeful,
Can you elaborate a little more, for my ol' tired noggin' ?
GO AMFA
NH/BB's
Can you elaborate a little more, for my ol' tired noggin' ?
GO AMFA
NH/BB's
- Dec 21, 2002
- 321
- 77
I think it would verge on the edge of collusion with the incumbent union and a loss of impartiality. Let me see by thier own filing they had 16,629 mech and related during the twa acquisition. Now they have 18,698 mech and related AFTER ALL THE LAYOFFS. Must be that new math they keep talking about!!! An addition of 2069 more mech and related according to AA. This does not suprise me since they will try as hard as they can to keep their lapdog union in power.But there lies the flaw in their plan. Since they have already filed previous documents with the NMB giving the 16,629 number as the master seinority list are they now lying or is it an omission of the truth??
NewHampshire Black Bears
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 10,154
- 681
I'm "MORTIFIED", and "AGHAST", that AA and the TWU(same ####), would do such a thing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!Hopeful said:
NH/BB's
johnny gearpin
Member
18,698 mech and related!!!
I must say I'm impressed with the total. I know that during the last UAL/IAM/AMFA election process there were names of people that have passed away on it.
Anyone who has been involved with organizing and the "list of eligibles" really understands this daunting task, work and of dedication involved to weed out the BS.
Best regards,
Johnny Gearpin
I must say I'm impressed with the total. I know that during the last UAL/IAM/AMFA election process there were names of people that have passed away on it.
Anyone who has been involved with organizing and the "list of eligibles" really understands this daunting task, work and of dedication involved to weed out the BS.
Best regards,
Johnny Gearpin
Checking it Out
Veteran
- Apr 3, 2003
- 1,702
- 0
Sounds like someone forgot to do some homework! Or could it be! Amfa wannabes are attempting to distract from their ability to tell the truth?
Sounds like Amfa filed with less than what they are telling the organizers! Is this an attempt to twist the issue!
Do you want us to believe Amfa should have the right to pick and choose who is eligible to vote? Is'nt that like telling the NMB to take a hike?
Learn the truth! Get the facts and you will see the inept of Amfa!
Sounds like Amfa filed with less than what they are telling the organizers! Is this an attempt to twist the issue!
Do you want us to believe Amfa should have the right to pick and choose who is eligible to vote? Is'nt that like telling the NMB to take a hike?
Learn the truth! Get the facts and you will see the inept of Amfa!
OP
Hopeful
Veteran
- Dec 21, 2002
- 5,998
- 347
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #8
CIO:
Don't be so cocky. The same disputes happened at UAL and NWA. And we all know how those AMFA elections turned out. At UAL, the IAM and company wanted to include SUPERVISORS in the numbers.
Never mind someone forgetting to do their homework! More like normal disputes that need to be investigated.
Don't be so cocky. The same disputes happened at UAL and NWA. And we all know how those AMFA elections turned out. At UAL, the IAM and company wanted to include SUPERVISORS in the numbers.
Never mind someone forgetting to do their homework! More like normal disputes that need to be investigated.
local 12 proud
Veteran
- Mar 5, 2004
- 4,265
- 4
rumor is twu rounded up all the drunk homless living under the over passes here in tulsa who used to work for aa until they had to file for personal bankruptcy and promised a high paying secure job as an osm if they would only vote twu!........(satire of course) :blink:
- Dec 21, 2002
- 321
- 77
The question of the day is was the company lying during the twa acquisition or are they lying now concerning the numbers of the mechanic and related.
DECISION 2007
Advanced
- Mar 19, 2004
- 101
- 0
The question is now, "will we see ya again in 2007?"?
Decision 2004
Veteran
- Mar 12, 2004
- 1,618
- 0
NO!DECISION 2007 said:
Once the TWU is defeated, they will never return!
Johnny Lunchbox
Advanced
- Feb 28, 2004
- 159
- 0
Is the key word here..once? *doh!* You are the same dummie that leased a building and called yourself a local prior to a vote...sawwwwweeeee..forgot!
Checking it Out
Veteran
- Apr 3, 2003
- 1,702
- 0
Sounds to me, you are preparing for the same demise as NWA! Layoff mass number! This pretty much sums it up!Decision 2004 said:
Will it be just above or below your seniority date?
Decision 2004
Veteran
- Mar 12, 2004
- 1,618
- 0
Are you saying that this TWU iron clad language is not any good?Checking it Out said:
Tell us all CIO, does that language have job protection at September 24, 1998 or not? And AMFA will inherit this language right?
So what exactly are you telling lies about on this one?
Similar threads
- Locked
