MSM-Obamascare a Disaster

[delldude]

You really fear Cruz don't you?

 

[southwind]

Washington Examiner reported:

this is because CGI became an approved government vendor in 2007.

This meant the company could be assigned government contracts worth up to $4 billion until 2017 without having to bid publicly for them.

The company was approved before Barack Obama was first inaugurated in 2009.
Townes-Whitley reportedly joined CGI in May 2010.

CGI was one of 16 companies qualified under the Bush administration to provide certain tech services to the federal government

Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz2is20TDqQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
il

I guess having a graduate from the same college as the First Lady working for you disqualifies the entire corporation from getting a contract. Makes sense.

Dell, you knew this would all fall on Bush, didn't you?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Dell, you knew this would all fall on Bush, didn't you?

Hey onion, try and keep up. The Washington examiner and Glenn Beck is where that came from.

 

[delldude]

Hey onion, try and keep up. The Washington examiner and Glenn Beck is where that came from.

What is it about Cruz that has you groveling through his life to the Nth degree but when it comes to Obama, all is sacred and accepted?

Obama has some interesting provable things in his past that make Cruz look like a Boy Scout.

Is this going to be another one of those weekends?

 

[delldude]

 

[traderjake]

I guess having a graduate from the same college as the First Lady working for you disqualifies the entire corporation from getting a contract.

A company that's obviously not qualified to do the job gets a no bid contract.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

 

[delldude]

I guess having a graduate from the same college as the First Lady working for you disqualifies the entire corporation from getting a contract. Makes sense.

This explains why you fail to back up your posts and answer direct questions.

Tyranny warning.....

As reported by the Washington Examiner in early October, the Department of Health and Human Services reviewed only CGI’s bid for the Obamacare account. CGI was one of 16 companies qualified under the Bush administration to provide certain tech services to the federal government. A senior vice president for the company testified this week before The House Committee on Energy and Commerce that four companies submitted bids, but did not name those companies or explain why only CGI’s bid was considered.

[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]Read more: http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz2itJYM9WR[/background]​

 

[Ms Tree]

A company that's obviously not qualified to do the job gets a no bid contract.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

Just because they job was not completed successfully does not mean they were not 'capable' of doing so. It has happened before, in fact quite recently.


One of the big reasons for cost over runs in the military applications is that the DoD keeps making modifications to the plans and requirements that require massive changes which cost money.


Given that the company was on the no bid list since 2007 as someone else pointed out kind of takes the wind out of the conspiracy theory.

 

[delldude]

Actually, this company had whined about not getting a piece of the pie before....

CGI Obamacare website contract Obamas (Barack & Michelle) crony capitalism or poor judgement, Toni McCall Townes-Whitley Senior VP CGI and Michelle Obama Princeton alumnus
“Public records indicate that during this time, every quarter from 2010 through 2012, CGI Group itself was lobbying on “HUD housing management contracts.”
Finally, there’s also a whistleblower lawsuit from a former CGI employee — who’d been recruited from HUD after overseeing the very Section 8 contracts CGI won — alleging that he was fired after refusing to go along with fraudulent plans to work around the bidding process. CGI denies the accusations, but has so far failed to get the case thrown out.”…Washington Post October 23, 2013

From The Washington Examiner October 13, 2013.
“Feds reviewed only one bid for Obamacare website design”
“Federal officials considered only one firm to design the Obamacare health insurance exchange website that has performed abysmally since its Oct. 1 debut.
Rather than open the contracting process to a competitive public solicitation with multiple bidders, officials in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid accepted a sole bidder, CGI Federal, the U.S. subsidiary of a Canadian company with an uneven record of IT pricing and contract performance.
CMS officials are tight-lipped about why CGI was chosen or how it happened. They also refuse to say if other firms competed with CGI, or if there was ever a public solicitation for building Healthcare.gov, the backbone of Obamacare’s problem-plagued web portal.

George Schindler, the president for U.S. and Canada of the Canadian-based CGI Group, CGI Federal’s parent company, became an Obama 2012 campaign donor after his company gained the Obamacare website contract.

[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]CGI was one of 16 companies qualified under the Bush administration to provide certain tech services to the federal government. A senior vice president for the company testified this week before The House Committee on Energy and Commerce that four companies submitted bids, but did not name those companies or explain why only CGI’s bid was considered.[/background]​

[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]Read more: http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz2iw4EgcRE[/background]​

Obama administration Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ failure at designing websites to provide government services began during her term as governor of Kansas, long before the Obamacare website debacle, Kansas political insiders told The Daily Caller.
Sebelius oversaw numerous costly and disastrous government website projects during her six-year governorship (2003-2009), including a failed update of the Department of Labor’s program to provide unemployment pay and other services and similar updates pertaining to the Department of Administration and the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) services.

[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]Read more: http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz2iw3kCyp8[/background]​

 

[traderjake]

Given that the company was on the no bid list since 2007 as someone else pointed out kind of takes the wind out of the conspiracy theory.

If you want to believe the company was chosen because it would do the best job at the lowest cost instead of political connections be my guest.

 

[Ms Tree]

If you want to believe the company was chosen because it would do the best job at the lowest cost instead of political connections be my guest.

You too? Can hou point out where I made either of those claims?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Given that the company was on the no bid list since 2007 as someone else pointed out kind of takes the wind out of the conspiracy theory.

There is nothing that will take any "wind out of the conspiracy theory" to someone who has infowars.com as her avatar.

 

[traderjake]

There's a reason some people don't see what's happening in the world around them.

Others are simply uninformed.

 

[traderjake]

"But middle-income consumers face an estimated 30% rate increase, on average, in California due to several factors tied to the healthcare law."

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-health-sticker-shock-20131027,0,2756077.story#axzz2ixYAmV34

 

[Dog Wonder]

There's a reason some people don't see what's happening in the world around them.

Others are simply uninformed.

Selfie?