- Banned
- #61
Are you sure you want to go with this?WorldTraveler said:forums judge #2 is about ready to get schooled by a real federal judge.
If you were as right as you are, the case wouldn't be in federal court.
And WN wouldn't have capitulated to DL's demands to use WN's gates - which WN had repeatedly denied until WN had a takl with a real federal judge.
If WN wants to run 180 flights/day at DAL, they are free to do so after they provide DL with access including for the flights that a judge affirms DL is entitled to add under its accommodation request.
You are the one that is lying, 700.
nowhere does it say that DL asked or that it received no reply.
Let me repost this one again, and show you and the rest of the board you are lying once again:
http://www.dallasnews.com/business/airline-industry/20150624-truce-lets-delta-keep-flying-out-of-love-field-till-court-fight-is-settled.ece
Quite simple, where is the proof that DL has been granted the right to add eight flights like you claim?The compromise leaves open Deltas request to begin operating eight more flights beginning Aug. 15, with two each to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Detroit and Salt Lake City, and two more to its Atlanta hub.
Southwest Airlines Co. has agreed to let Delta Air Lines keep operating temporarily out of a Dallas Love Field gate, averting a July 7 showdown that could have had Southwest blocking Delta from the airport.
Delta is pleased that Southwest has agreed to continue accommodating the five flights Delta currently operates at Love Field while the airlines pursue a long-term resolution in the courts, Delta spokeswoman Kate D. Modolo said Wednesday.
I provided factual proof of my claim, clearly stated by the DMN and DL itself.