Looks Like AA wants back into Love Field

Status
Not open for further replies.
WorldTraveler said:
forums judge #2 is about ready to get schooled by a real federal judge.

If you were as right as you are, the case wouldn't be in federal court.

And WN wouldn't have capitulated to DL's demands to use WN's gates - which WN had repeatedly denied until WN had a takl with a real federal judge.

If WN wants to run 180 flights/day at DAL, they are free to do so after they provide DL with access including for the flights that a judge affirms DL is entitled to add under its accommodation request.

You are the one that is lying, 700.

nowhere does it say that DL asked or that it received no reply.
Are you sure you want to go with this?
 
Let me repost this one again, and show you and the rest of the board you are lying once again:

http://www.dallasnews.com/business/airline-industry/20150624-truce-lets-delta-keep-flying-out-of-love-field-till-court-fight-is-settled.ece
 
The compromise leaves open Deltas request to begin operating eight more flights beginning Aug. 15, with two each to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Detroit and Salt Lake City, and two more to its Atlanta hub.
 
Southwest Airlines Co. has agreed to let Delta Air Lines keep operating temporarily out of a Dallas Love Field gate, averting a July 7 showdown that could have had Southwest blocking Delta from the airport.
 
Delta is pleased that Southwest has agreed to continue accommodating the five flights Delta currently operates at Love Field while the airlines pursue a long-term resolution in the courts, Delta spokeswoman Kate D. Modolo said Wednesday.
 
 
 
Quite simple, where is the proof that DL has been granted the right to add eight flights like you claim?
 
I provided factual proof of my claim, clearly stated by the DMN and DL itself.
 
you lied.

there is no statement that DL made a request or it was denied or unresponded to.

DL's request remains open because DL's right to add flights is part of the same law that is being litigated.

talk to Kev. he has his head on straight on this aspect of this issue.
 
You are truly delusional, I posted it, read it.
 
You need help, I mean you are clearly obsessed with DL ruling the world.

Wow, all I can is wow.
 
I read exactly what you wrote and it is not in the least related to what was stated in the article.

DL has the right to add flights; DL has not exercised that right and those rights still remain and have not been acted on by any party.
 
swamt said:
I see someone is still up to their usual tactics, just by reading your response.
+1

 
swamt said:
He seems to be the only one that doesn't understand or grasp how it works at DAL.  We have tried and tried to explain it to him and he will never get it.
him and spectator, lol
 
 
If AA doesnt' get back into Love Filed then they will go bankrupt and all the AA routes and assets will be picked up by Delta.
 
700UW said:
Are you sure you want to go with this?
 
Let me repost this one again, and show you and the rest of the board you are lying once again:

http://www.dallasnews.com/business/airline-industry/20150624-truce-lets-delta-keep-flying-out-of-love-field-till-court-fight-is-settled.ece
 
Quite simple, where is the proof that DL has been granted the right to add eight flights like you claim?
 
I provided factual proof of my claim, clearly stated by the DMN and DL itself.
700, Forgive me if I am off line here but there is no proof of Delta getting or being granted the 8 additional flights beyong the original 5 to ATL.  Delta was simply hoping to get the use of the 2 or one gate so they were throwing it out to the media as to gain more sympathy from the judge.  Delta has asked for 8 more but has never been granted anything above or beyond the current 5 flts to ATL...
 
Phoenix said:
If AA doesnt' get back into Love Filed then they will go bankrupt and all the AA routes and assets will be picked up by Delta.
LOL.  Now that was funny...
 
Correct swamt, but a certain poster keeps claiming DL can add additional flights anytime, I have proved him wrong, but yet he still runs with the misinformation and yet when asked to proved proof he never does, so we all know once again he made it up.
 
a couple posters have been dead wrong about DL and DAL over every step of the past 18 months.

and some even bother to comment on things that they supposedly ignore

just sayin' on both counts.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #70
Mods, can plz lock this topic I have started regarding AA returning to Dal. Clearly this is now about Delta not AA
 
FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:
i can't speak for others, but I will say that DL is doomed! (According to the theory that the #3 carrier in any market is doomed).
 

So when/if AA wants back in, as a new entrant, it will have to be accommodated -afterall, a new entrant to DAL increases competition, which according to you is what the DOT wants.
 
Please do spin away!
pretty sure Delta is 4th now in the Dallas market. 
 
Bankruptcy must be what is next, if you follow WTs theory. 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top