Just another liberal hypocrite

[KCFlyer]

I love it when people who never read the Bible try to interpret the Bible. SHARIA IS AT YOUR DOORSTEPS. Thank- GOD Trump is taking us into the future of this dreaded indoctrination of submission to a F%CKING backwards salvage indoctrination.

What's Leviticus 20:10 tell us about adultery?

 

[delldude]

What's Leviticus 20:10 tell us about adultery?

Where we got the TG thing.....can't locate that in the word.

 

[DTSPC20]

Oh yeah, what rights are those?

Marriage for one.

 

[DTSPC20]

And that will translate into growth, which will help translate into higher tax revenue, and thus, lower deficits...

The Bush Administration and groups like the Heritage Foundation said the same thing in 2001? Did it happen, quite the opposite.

 

[EastUS1]

Much like 75 percent of your posts, this is incoherent babble.

Indeed. I've sometimes wondered if that poor fellow didn't attempt, but utterly flunk learning the essentials of haiku and/or the potential elegance of very brief poetic expressions...or was simply the sad victim of some earlier life traumatic head injury. After reading enough postings I've sadly had to conclude the latter case to be most likely...although one can't immediately dismiss the possibilty of severe damage from drugs. Dog must be given his due as a gentle spirit though, given that none could ever mount a viably scathing reply or any serious insult whilst equipped with nothing more than single line of essential incoherence ever offered. Seriously though; I actually suspect he's probably a like-able sort in person who wishes no honest harm to anyone.

 

[xUT]

Nope...they sure don't....providing of course it impacts THEM. Christians seem to really focus on the Old Testament in their condemnation of things they don't like. Like gay marriage. They point to Leviticus 20:13 to "justify" their position on "protecting marriage". So one would be led to believe that this Leviticus guy MUST be someone who knows what he's talking about. The trouble is, a lot of "normal" marriages end in divorce and in many cases, the divorce is brought about by adultery. Now...the guy that the Christian Right supported and who became our president grabbed a lot of puzzy while he was married to women. He might have even gotten a little piece of puddy on the side while still married. That's called "adultery". Now good old Leviticus happened to mention adultery in 20:10....but these values voters must be missing THAT part of their bibles.

IMHO, the Christian Right has every right in the world to pull out that bible and base their decisions on the contents therein. But the only thing is....they need to base EVERYTHING on that book. If Leviticus condemns homosexuality....great - cite him til the cows come home. But when it comes time to endorse a presidential candidate, don't forget about what Leviticus would say about what HE HAS DONE. If one candidate shouldn't be supported because she supports rights for those nasty homosexuals, then they shouldn't support a candidate who is a 3 time (at least) adulterer. They should sit on the sidelines and tell their sheep that their on their own on this one.

I have never heard any politician (and few Pastors...) quote the 'New Testament' which is the Testament of Jesus Christ.
Not enough material and/or doesn't fit the crowd.

 

[KCFlyer]

I have never heard any politician (and few Pastors...) quote the 'New Testament' which is the Testament of Jesus Christ.
Not enough material and/or doesn't fit the crowd.

It's rather funny to me....Jewish people won't get to heaven until they accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, but they use the Jewish bible as the way we should live our lives.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Marriage for one.

Gay marriage was never about equal rights.

It was a component of leftist socialist engineering imposed on the people.

 

[KCFlyer]

Gay marriage was never about equal rights.

It was a component of leftist socialist engineering imposed on the people.

Just like whites marrying Negros back in the 60's. People are born gay. The right doesn't believe it.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Just like whites marrying Negros back in the 60's. People are born gay. The right doesn't believe it.

I love it when leftist bring this up.

A mixed couple can reproduce. A gay couple cannot.

Gay males have created an HIV epidemic. Don't take my word for it go to the CDC website.

Of course leftist never want to talk about how rapidly homosexual men have (and are) spreading HIV.

Better yet here is a section of one of my old posts.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/

In 2014:

• Gay and bisexual men accounted for 83% (29,418) of the estimated new HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 and older and 67% of the total estimated new diagnoses in the United States.
• Gay and bisexual men aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 92% of new HIV diagnoses among all men in their age group and 27% of new diagnoses among all gay and bisexual men.
• Gay and bisexual men accounted for an estimated 54% (11,277) of people diagnosed with AIDS. Of those men, 39% were African American, 32% were white, and 24% were Hispanic/Latino

 

[KCFlyer]

I know quite a few heterosexual couples who opted not to reproduce. Should their marriage license be revoked?


Did you ever stop to think that if gay men were held to the same Christian standards as heterosexual couples....that is monogamy without adultery, it might prevent casual sex between unmarried gay men? Just a thought there.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

I know quite a few heterosexual couples who opted not to reproduce. Should their marriage license be revoked?


Did you ever stop to think that if gay men were held to the same Christian standards as heterosexual couples....that is monogamy without adultery, it might prevent casual sex between unmarried gay men? Just a thought there.

So your argument is that an estimated what... say 2 percent of the population spreading around 54 percent of new HIV diagnoses will suddenly value monogamy?

Seriously?

That is your argument?

That is the dumbest thing you have said all year. Then again I am not really giving you a chance.... it is only January.

 

[KCFlyer]

So your argument is that an estimated what... say 2 percent of the population spreading around 54 percent of new HIV diagnoses will suddenly value monogamy?

Seriously?

That is your argument?

That is the dumbest thing you have said all year. Then again I am not really giving you a chance.... it is only January.

Great numbers. Now tell me why preventing them from getting married will help reduce that number?

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Great numbers. Now tell me why preventing them from getting married will help reduce that number?

Nice sidestep.

Kind of like the Obama administration sidestepped hundreds of years of culture and tradition while IMPOSING change on the American people.

Gay marriage was never about equal rights. It is simply leftist trying to attack and debase religion by making a mockery of one of it's foundations. People put religion ahead of big brother and the leftist simply can't have that.

I think we can both agree the spread of HIV is at epidemic rates among homosexual men. There is no mention of that in the media because it does not support the narrative. They don't care about the truth only the goal of IMPOSING change on the American people until they have absolute control of our lives.

Obama did not drive a government wedge into the healthcare industry to improve healthcare for Americans and he did not impose gay marriage on the populace because of equal rights. He did it because he wanted to grab power for the government.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Nice stumble on your face.