Just another liberal hypocrite

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Look who is back. The witch's spawn. Picking out the religion he wants for others

Much like 75 percent of your posts, this is incoherent babble.

 

[P. REZ]

Huh. I agree that a possible $1.4T in deficits over 10 years isn't ideal, but that's nothing compared to the just under $10T we saw during Obama's reign.

But, there's also the possibility that if economic growth increases beyond the tepid estimates the CBO used, deficits might actually shrink.

That conservative bastion CNBC estimated that 70% of Americans have $10K or less in savings, which implies to me that 70% will likely be spending the money the government isn't stealing from them come February.

And that will translate into growth, which will help translate into higher tax revenue, and thus, lower deficits...

Lol, and Santa visited your house didn't he?

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ear-and-violence-will-be-confronted-says-iran

Iran’s interior minister, Abdolreza Rahmani-Fazil, said on Sunday that authorities would not tolerate the “spreading of violence, fear and terror”, which he said would “definitely be confronted”.

Is this guy serious. That is all Iran has done for decades.


http://www.independentsentinel.com/...has-the-left-ever-been-more-morally-bankrupt/

 

[KCFlyer]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ear-and-violence-will-be-confronted-says-iran

Iran’s interior minister, Abdolreza Rahmani-Fazil, said on Sunday that authorities would not tolerate the “spreading of violence, fear and terror”, which he said would “definitely be confronted”.

Is this guy serious. That is all Iran has done for decades.


http://www.independentsentinel.com/...has-the-left-ever-been-more-morally-bankrupt/

View attachment 12380

YEs...he SHOULD have take a cue from our dear leader and labeled it "fake news".

 

[cltrat]

Bless your heart Kc

 

[Dog Wonder]

Much like 75 percent of your posts, this is incoherent babble.

Meeting babble with babble?

 

[KCFlyer]

Bless your heart Kc

That's what our dear leader does when discussing protesters

 

[DTSPC20]

Does his religion support wife beating and honor killing?

You actually never read the bible did you?

 

[DTSPC20]

Evangelicals were pretty much left with making the better bad choice, and chose the candidate who was closer to their value system.

Their value system obviously being greed, misogyny, and hate.

 

[DTSPC20]

Christians as a whole don't require perfection. They understand that all people sin. Though I will grant you there are those fanatics who are far too quick to throw stones. I have been a target of a few of those stones myself.

The fact they endorsed him simply means they find enough common ground with his stated beliefs that they chose to show support. Their endorsement does not communicate that they think he has no flaws or that they agree with all of his behaviors or ideals.

Frankly that has nothing to do with the post I made and instead of discussing the topic you are trying to deflect. There are already tons of Trump threads on this forum, we don't need another.

Do you actually have anything to say about what I posted?

Funny how forgiving some Christians can be when it suits their needs. Yet they're all fire and brimstone and literal interpretation of the bible when someone tries to get the same rights they do.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Funny how forgiving some Christians can be when it suits their needs. Yet they're all fire and brimstone and literal interpretation of the bible when someone tries to get the same rights they do.

Oh yeah, what rights are those?

 

[delldude]

You actually never read the bible did you?

Christianity doesn't adhere to those tenets like some others do to this day, do they?

 

[KCFlyer]

Christianity doesn't adhere to those tenets like some others do to this day, do they?

Nope...they sure don't....providing of course it impacts THEM. Christians seem to really focus on the Old Testament in their condemnation of things they don't like. Like gay marriage. They point to Leviticus 20:13 to "justify" their position on "protecting marriage". So one would be led to believe that this Leviticus guy MUST be someone who knows what he's talking about. The trouble is, a lot of "normal" marriages end in divorce and in many cases, the divorce is brought about by adultery. Now...the guy that the Christian Right supported and who became our president grabbed a lot of puzzy while he was married to women. He might have even gotten a little piece of puddy on the side while still married. That's called "adultery". Now good old Leviticus happened to mention adultery in 20:10....but these values voters must be missing THAT part of their bibles.

IMHO, the Christian Right has every right in the world to pull out that bible and base their decisions on the contents therein. But the only thing is....they need to base EVERYTHING on that book. If Leviticus condemns homosexuality....great - cite him til the cows come home. But when it comes time to endorse a presidential candidate, don't forget about what Leviticus would say about what HE HAS DONE. If one candidate shouldn't be supported because she supports rights for those nasty homosexuals, then they shouldn't support a candidate who is a 3 time (at least) adulterer. They should sit on the sidelines and tell their sheep that their on their own on this one.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Where did he go?

 

[KCFlyer]

I would put little salt in the libtards comments of KCFuckhead and Dog Stupid. THey never admit they're wrong even when thew evidence can't be denied. The true retards!

Tard AND the F word. Must have hit a nerve. God bless you my son.