Colonel.Ramp
Advanced
One of the rumored stations is IAH where I am. It is TWU per the NMB ruling last year over CWA. There were a few stations that the NMB originally said had to be given to TWU in terms of fleet service. TWU was probably in this other stations pre bankruptcy so it makes sense. Maybe someone here can confirm stations such as ABQ, MSY, IND, RSW, SAN, etc. We've already had mechanics that were previously at IAH as well as managers swear IAH is reopening but all of that is a pipe dream until the ink is dry. So yes I am biased and would definitely like to see certain stations reopen for our sake and for those who were displaced. We definitely have the threshold necessary so that shouldn't be the hangup. And I don't buy the nonsense about the company to trying to save money yet they completed new lounges, breakrooms, locker rooms and new equipment to boot. Why spend if you have no plans to expand?I asked about this last week, and if IIRC Prez said he thought (not for sure but thought) that whatever Scope Clause ends up in the new JCBA will be closer to LUS than LAA.
Would that not mean that the grandfathered stations you mention would be reopened if we end up with something closer to LUS Scope? Closer to LUS would have to be around 7 or 8 flights a day worst possible case scenario. Surely that would bring cities like DEN, DTW, SAN, SNA, etc. back online? Or is there something I am missing? Are these stations not LUS staffed now?
Not to open up another can of worms, but has it already been determined who will represent stations like the ones I listed. I would think the TWU would have an issue with all of them being IAM represented. Was this already determined back when they were discussing the BOS situation?