True. The leverage we have is, as long as there is separation of metal below wing, the company may fall short of projected profits, as originally presented to the shareholders, in this merger agreement. Outside of that, the company is under no legal obligation, in JCBA talks, to reach an agreement. Under Section 6 negotiations, the fail switch for the union, is to legally withdrawal services (Strike). Even with Fleet... a huge disruption to operational integrity and potential profit. Is it a stretch, given these circumstances, the company would wait for formal Section 6 negotiations, if they cannot achieve the necessary concessions in JCBA talks? They have projected "synergies" to be gained by combining the work groups. Promises made to the shareholders and Wall Street in their bankruptcy plan presented to the Judge. This is why, IMO, members should not be disappointed when the company is not willing to give back all that has been taken. Know Thy Enemy!