We explained it precisely how it was to work. As a matter of fact, even before the BK agreement, we went against Bob Owens premise of the payment of the Match in the event of the Trust being dissolved.
During the other debates, we always maintained the trigger for the payment wasn't met.
During the arbitration we said there wasn't a trigger and the arbitrator didn't have the authority to force a payment.
We maintained the same consistent message throughout.
The only wrench thrown into the gears was having Judge Lane rule against the Company's Summary Judgement.