JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.
NYer said:
If it went to 8 we'd have to close one maybe two of the remaining stations. Sounds like a concession.
So good. I'm glad to read you don't support concessions either. Glad you're finally getting onboard.

No "middle" ground?
 
WeAAsles said:
Absolutely not a puppet. At least not to people who didn't promise him anything.

One of his favorite quotes I've heard is "What's in it for me"

Unconfirmed of course?
 
Unconfirmed, huh.
 
Funny.
 
NYer said:
 
If it went to 8 we'd have to close one maybe two of the remaining stations. Sounds like a concession.
What they did here is not close some below the threshold while not opening some above , fair no one gets hurt, again this is not section six
 
Tim Nelson said:
He defends it by saying we are now guaranteed $30.77 instead of $28.50, due to the WN and UA contract raises. Unfortunately, I'm still making $24.39 and looking at another whopping 2% raise next month. Thanks to the weasel. Don't get me wrong, if they brought back $30.77 at DOS and got enhancements in every article without concessions then I'll vote for weasel to be the next Grand Poopa.
We aren't comparing to SWA. Just UAL is what we should be aiming for.

And not "planning" on running for anything again but I'll accept your vote if I ever change my mind.
 
WeAAsles said:
If you can recall since it might be important to you. I also supported that after a little time passed they should have smoothed some things over and started getting together.

But that also would have confirmed at least to most members that the fix was in. The Association was a setup to begin with and the idea of a vote nothing more than a big farce.

Did you know that the idea of the vote was just a farce from the beginning? Cmon man. Fess up.
 
Who controls whether there is a vote or not? It's the National Mediation Board.
 
WeAAsles said:
Absolutely not a puppet. At least not to people who didn't promise him anything.

One of his favorite quotes I've heard is "What's in it for me"

Unconfirmed of course?
 
It's too bad you can't have debate without getting personal, calling people names, insulting their intelligence or just throw accusations hoping for something to stick.
 
If you believe in an position debate it on its merits, not by trying to disparage the debater.
 
Those tactics make you lose your credibility.
 
NYer said:
 
It's too bad you can't have debate without getting personal, calling people names, insulting their intelligence or just throw accusations hoping for something to stick.
 
If you believe in an position debate it on its merits, not by trying to disparage the debater.
 
Those tactics make you lose your credibility.
And the Weez said he was getting tired of Trump
 
WeAAsles said:
So good. I'm glad to read you don't support concessions either. Glad you're finally getting onboard.

No "middle" ground?
 
Nobody supports concessions, however the circumstances dictate what is and what isn't possible.
 
Well, the conversation we were having about the JCBA will now be taken over by WeAAsle and his need to attack. We could be getting a bunch of posts with links to read or videos with lyrics he believes fits the occasion.
 
Carry on everyone and my apologies we can't continue with the debate on the JCBA, but W will now make it into a personal attack crusade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top