Decision 2004
Veteran
- Mar 12, 2004
- 1,618
- 0
That 27 number is so close you cannot handle it?
Would you prefer a number like say "3200" as in the number that did not get pin numbers to vote on the Industry Leading Concession?
There never was an NMB validation check on every card, so you cannot prove they were not valid, anymore than I can prove they were. So if there was never a validation check, how can you claim to know for a fact? I was involved and cannot even claim every card would have been declared valid by the NMB.
I do however, know that the cards were audited three times and many obvious invalid cards were removed before submission to the NMB. There were 9,274 cards submitted after audit. That is the truth, that is fact, and anything else is just opinion.
I find it interesting that you can point out every little flaw you percieve in the AMFA leadership, yet you cannot see the flaws of your current union representation. At least with AMFA you get a ballot and a chance for change if that is what you wish. In contrast, all you get with the TWU is promise of change when AMFA pounds on the door, but substance of change does not exist.
You still have that Knot-Logic disease that forms a belief that a union should be something seperate from the membership.
The TWU should really be named:
Transport Workers Dictatorship fo America, AFL-CIO
Get it? TWD instead of TWU
Would you prefer a number like say "3200" as in the number that did not get pin numbers to vote on the Industry Leading Concession?
There never was an NMB validation check on every card, so you cannot prove they were not valid, anymore than I can prove they were. So if there was never a validation check, how can you claim to know for a fact? I was involved and cannot even claim every card would have been declared valid by the NMB.
I do however, know that the cards were audited three times and many obvious invalid cards were removed before submission to the NMB. There were 9,274 cards submitted after audit. That is the truth, that is fact, and anything else is just opinion.
I find it interesting that you can point out every little flaw you percieve in the AMFA leadership, yet you cannot see the flaws of your current union representation. At least with AMFA you get a ballot and a chance for change if that is what you wish. In contrast, all you get with the TWU is promise of change when AMFA pounds on the door, but substance of change does not exist.
You still have that Knot-Logic disease that forms a belief that a union should be something seperate from the membership.
The TWU should really be named:
Transport Workers Dictatorship fo America, AFL-CIO
Get it? TWD instead of TWU