If the Oregon militiamen were Muslim or black, they'd probably be dead by now

Kev3188 said:
Meanwhile, the fact remains that this was an armed take over of a federal building. That's not "patriotism," it's sedition.
Surrounding an unoccupied building in a wildlife sanctuary that even the wildlife have been abandoning hardly meets the intent of sedition...

Try reading all the facts on how FWS have tried to squeeze out the ranch owners, and you start to see some abuses of power by the government.

Certainly, a backfire or prescribed burn don't qualify as arson unless the government was just looking for a way to retaliate.

If a private landowner had failed to maintain land in a way that caused damage to a neighboring property, there'd be a civil case for damages and liability, not a criminal proceeding. The only exception to that would be if it caused someone else's death, which might result in a manslaughter charge.
 
Kev3188 said:
Sure. I'm here to help. Pick one you like:

#VanillaISIS

#Teabillies

#Sendsnacks.
 
Kev3188 said:
The Hammonds have been flouting the law for years. These guys just co-opted that as an excuse to wage Yee-hawd.
 
And liberals wonder why they can never taken seriously.
 
You're a prime example. 
 
eolesen said:
Surrounding an unoccupied building in a wildlife sanctuary that even the wildlife have been abandoning hardly meets the intent of sedition...Try reading all the facts on how FWS have tried to squeeze out the ranch owners, and you start to see some abuses of power by the government.Certainly, a backfire or prescribed burn don't qualify as arson unless the government was just looking for a way to retaliate.If a private landowner had failed to maintain land in a way that caused damage to a neighboring property, there'd be a civil case for damages and liability, not a criminal proceeding. The only exception to that would be if it caused someone else's death, which might result in a manslaughter charge.
But MORE government is GOOD!
Before long the Libtards will be asking them to wipe their ass for them.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #52
An armed militia occupying federal land with the stated intention of taking it is not sedition,?

Right...
 
Ifly2 said:
An armed militia occupying federal land with the stated intention of taking it is not sedition,?

Right...
 
As opposed to burning your city down because of some false narrative.....promoted by lefties like yourself?
 
heh
 
Its a much bigger issue than Oregon.
They are probably making a point over the Fed taking land from range owners, fair exchange is no robbery......I doubt its right....you won't win against the Fed, even when innocent.
 
Do you support the land grabs across the west by a BLM sometimes running rampant using EPA like tactics?
 
One of those farmers, maybe Bundy, lost land to a Harry Reid pipe dream for a
solar power venture, which, I'm sure he had his hand in.
 
Who would you trust more, those occupying that fed facility or the ones occupying the fed facility at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave? 
 
Kev3188 said:
Do you support what these guys are doing?
 
If you knew the facts in the case you would think differently.
 
But looking at the world thru far left liberal glasses, distorts your vision of reality and truth. 
 
delldude said:
Its a much bigger issue than Oregon.
They are probably making a point over the Fed taking land from range owners, fair exchange is no robbery......I doubt its right....you won't win against the Fed, even when innocent.
 
Do you support the land grabs across the west by a BLM sometimes running rampant using EPA like tactics?
 
One of those farmers, maybe Bundy, lost land to a Harry Reid pipe dream for a
solar power venture, which, I'm sure he had his hand in.
 
Who would you trust more, those occupying that fed facility or the ones occupying the fed facility at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave? 
If those sorts of things were in play, I might be more amenable to listening. I would certainly support the 500!or so ranchers that had previously shown up in Burns to protest, even if I disagreed with their message.

What we have instead is a family who for decades has flouted the law, had to deal with it (and have), and a bunch of other people co-opting it as some sort of "cause."

As for who I would trust more? Well, these guys stormed a bird sanctuary in one of the coldest places in Oregon... In January... And are now asking for snacks & socks both. Think I'll stick w/1600 Penn for now...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top