320tech
Senior
Hey 700 just a quick question what about the airbus checks that you guys promised would be back in house? it seems the company gave up the higher costs checks on the 757 & 737 to keep the less expensive checks at taca.
IAM M&R Interim Agreement Reached
- Thread starter 700UW
- Start date
Hey 700 just a quick question what about the airbus checks that you guys promised would be back in house? it seems the company gave up the higher costs checks on the 757 & 737 to keep the less expensive checks at taca.
320tech
Senior
well if its all ready covered why isn't it back? they reps down there have been told nothing and its running like nothing is changing.
Smartest Loser
Senior
- Jun 20, 2003
- 313
- 0
While surfing the internet...Found this little tibit.
Its the playbook mgt. used on us twice...!!!
http://www.chpdm.org/Symposium/June_13_Pre...Jerry_Glass.pdf
Its the playbook mgt. used on us twice...!!!
http://www.chpdm.org/Symposium/June_13_Pre...Jerry_Glass.pdf
Charlie_Tuna
Veteran
- Sep 29, 2005
- 661
- 0
Didn't all the other unions have the same or similar Successorship language? If so then what is going on with them and company?
I have to admit I have a sneaky suspicion that the reason the hearing/decision by the arbitrator was pushed back was to negotiate away the possible snapback.
I have to admit I have a sneaky suspicion that the reason the hearing/decision by the arbitrator was pushed back was to negotiate away the possible snapback.
Charlie_Tuna
Veteran
- Sep 29, 2005
- 661
- 0
Wasn't it originally supposed to be held in late 2006. I remember the exact day I was told it was moved into 2007.
Also in regards to you saying the NC would not negotiate away the snapback can you go into great detail what changed you mind about that?
Smartest Loser
Senior
- Jun 20, 2003
- 313
- 0
Charlie_Tuna
Veteran
- Sep 29, 2005
- 661
- 0
He said he believe's it true. It is just his opinion. That doesn't mean its true. There is nothing to prove and obviously it would be virtually impossible to prove without internal document leaks.
I believe it is true but have no proof (the part about everything on table).
He could just as easy ask you to prove you talked to the GC's. It would be nice if you were not so defensive and combative all the time and just have an open discussion. You have very useful information but I think a lot of people are turned off by your delivery methods thus they attack back. Then again maybe I am all wrong about it.
Smartest Loser
Senior
- Jun 20, 2003
- 313
- 0
Exactly...Listen, I have been a union memeber now for 25 years and I have seen many issues and items which were considered "untouchable". Some way...Some how, those were pulled from the table and something else replaced it.
It's not my first day at the rodeo cowboy. I know how these things work.
SL
you prove it, if you are not working at US and your " friend is giving you information on our contract then he should be investigated, we do not need any loose lips when it comes to " our" contract. you keep posting as if you are still part of us and most of the time it is just an iam " special bulletin" that don't me a cr** to us. we want some real leadership and a union that will listen to us. can you say decert?????
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #30
There are no secrets being revealed, I worked with the members of tne NC as I was a member. People still ask advice and I still have a pension and family and friends that work for US, did not see any laws or IAM regulations that says I cant talk about it or talk to people involved.
Go ahead and decertify and see what you will get from Al Hemenway and Doug Parker.
You will get a big pink slip.
But you always try to make it about me and not the issue.
Envy?
Go ahead and decertify and see what you will get from Al Hemenway and Doug Parker.
You will get a big pink slip.
But you always try to make it about me and not the issue.
Envy?
