Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
700UW said:Heavy Maintenance is the majority of the workforce and Utility is 1,000 of the 4,500 Mechanic and related employees.
There is no way the IAM can takeout an agreement that will eliminate over 50% of the workforce, that is plain and simple, the members will not ratify it.
[post="235073"][/post]
700UW said:Heavy Maintenance is the majority of the workforce and Utility is 1,000 of the 4,500 Mechanic and related employees.
There is no way the IAM can takeout an agreement that will eliminate over 50% of the workforce, that is plain and simple, the members will not ratify it.
[post="235073"][/post]
USA320Pilot said:It's my understanding the IAM-FSA is close to a TA that will likely be announced before Thursday, January 6. The new labor accord will have an initial pay rate of about $17.50 per hour with other savings that will reach their cost cut target.
Rank-and-file reports indicate the AFA will ratify their new TA by a wide margin and the IAM-Trainers should obtain a TA.
It's unclear at this time if there will be a deal between the IAM-M and the company. It's possible, but most observers consider it unlikely before Thursday.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
[post="234988"][/post]
unit4clt said:Makes no sense for the IAM to come to an agreement for FSA's, without securing a deal for the Mechanics!!!!! :unsure:
Why would they push an agreement with one group on one day, then demand them to strike for the other group the next?
I know, I know we're talking about the IAM.
[post="235190"][/post]
umech said:OK 700w; the union iam will not negociate,we don't ratify any company proposal,so as to preserve utility and heavy maintenance,and stores,and gse,and plant maintenance plus thensome+++; on thrusday the judge rules in favor of the company (to terminate our contract) then what ; the union can not order s strike,not slow down, not any kind of job action, THE COMPANY PLAINLY TELL EVERYONE THIS IS YOUR CONTRACT GOT TO WORK OR IF YOU DONT LIKE IT PICK UP YOUR PROPERTY AND LEAVE THE PREMESIS.
WE WONT BE ABLE TO FORM PICKETT LINES (WE WILL BE ARRESTED) SO..... i think the iam position of kill all to save none is mistaken..
i am sure you are a nice person, we have different views of our common issue ,THIS
ABOVE IS MY VIEW.
IAM :down: :down: :down:
[post="235156"][/post]
Me too easy mistake to make.pitguy said:I apologize; I just looked into the contract book and could not find the Maintenance Trainers. I believe I may have misspoken when I said they were under the same contract as the other maintenance related positions. It appears they are the only maintenance group that stands out on their own and not in with others groups on their contract.
-Thx 700.
[post="235070"][/post]
Bob Owens said:And why do you feel you can not strike?
Read the RLA, everything as far as prohibiting self help centers around the maintenance of the status quo. Once that changes, and the company imposes new conditions what is legally stopping you from striking? Under what statute can the judge force workers for a profit orientated company to work under conditions that they do not agree to? Doesnt that in effect make you a slave to a private corporation?
Once changed conditions are put in place that your union did not agree to they are free to strike, that has always been the case. The only time that judges force employees to continue to work is when the conditions that were in place prior to the dispute remain in place. So if a judge releases USAIR from the contract the only way he could force you back to work is if USAIR abided by the contract and changed nothing.
[post="235284"][/post]