WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #46
yeah! we're getting to the same page.Well you brought up the load factor theory, not me.
But just to put more holes in your theory, because WN has lower load factors than some of its competitors and still is making record profits without charging for the first two bags, WN has more opportunities to increase revenue much more than the others.
Having extra seats to fill is not a liability at these profit levels.
It is just a bigger opportunity to make even more.
I do not believe that WN is at a liability, as you note, but simply that THE INCREASED REVENUE if the LFs were increased could go a long ways to providing the revenue that WN needs in order to justify higher salaries.
You are right that the LFs are like baggage fees which provide potential increased revenues.
Again, there is no doubt in my mind or yours that WN can make money with their current revenue structure.
But if WN is reluctant to increase salaries, then they have to either come up with more revenues to justify higher labor costs or labor will have to demonstrate why it should be paid more than its peers at other airlines.
If WN labor can do the latter, then the cost and revenue part is immaterial... but I don't think it will be.