How about this. Any AWA employee that comes east gets stapled to the bottom. Any U employee that goes west gets stapled to the bottom. Any new bases get date of hire. Does that sound fair to you. We never get to live in sunny PHX and u never get to go to Europe (unless they do it out of PHX). I could live with this but I hope it does'nt come to that. In a few years with what growth i think will happen and with the amt of U employees that are leaving with the buyouts and retirement it will not matter much. Please tell me what your relative seniorty should be. Say you were to come to PHL and you have 10 years with AWA how many years would you expect to have at the new carrier? Is it that you think you should have date of hire on the east coast but any U employee that goes west should loose some seniority as to not effect what you can fly? give me an example please of a 10 year AWA employee one the east coast and a 10 year U employee in PHX. By the way AWA isn't saving anyone. If this merger doesn't happen and AA or NW come after AWA you will go on the bottom. If you don't merge with U who else would you like to merge with?hp_fa said:Not at the expense of HP employees. Doug Parker has never lied to us and he said he will not hurt the employees who got HP to where it is.
Let's be really clear. I am not looking to better myself at the expense of US Airways employees, such as would happen with a staple job. But I am certain that my fellow employees do not want to pe pushed down in relative seniority either. I would not be surprised if a condition of the transaction is that everyone keeps their relative seniority in any merging of workforce lists. Otherwise, HP employees are bound to suffer, which Doug Parker has said won't happen.
IMO, if you folks want saving, you need to be nice to whomever is throwing you a life preserver or else it may not be thrown.
[post="270756"][/post]