La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,413
- 2,649
Bob Owens do you remember using the term "Golden Handcuffs" in relation to seniority?
I am curious to know if your opinion has evolved. If you still believe as you did before, how would you implement minimizing the penalty of moving from one carrier to another?
I find it ironic that a UNION would have to take steps to initiate a benefit that every non UNION skilled worker gets by default.
I still feel seniority is a tool of manipulation and entrapment.
I guess people have to make a decision. Is it worth entrapment and erosion to have supposed job protection?
Complicated question indeed.
Bob Owens said:Because it builds reliance and dependency on the company. People tend to be willing to give stuff up to preserve the Airline and the seniority they have acquired there. This is not as much of a factor in normal jobs where everyone works days with weekends and Holidays off, but in our industry Seniority means more than just layoff protection, it affects quality of life. The less dependent on AA and more portable you keep yourself the more likely you will be willing to not only fight to keep what you have but also demand more. I would rather see a restructure of the way we negotiate contracts that minimizes the importance of seniority without giving anything away such as substantial premiums for working weekends and odd shifts and to do away with all steps to top pay in the contract, when you get hired you are in the same boat as the next guy. We derive zero benefit from making a guy wait five to ten years to get up to our pay rates. Why have steps? Isn't the experienced mechanic who is hired off the street expected to work just as hard as the rest of us? The company gets to benefit from cheap labor that's all. We should structure our contracts to maximize pay and minimize the penalty from moving from one carrier to the next, portability gives us leverage at the bargaining table. If not for seniority how many of us would still be here at AA? I wouldn't. Seniority has forged Golden Handcuffs on us.
I am curious to know if your opinion has evolved. If you still believe as you did before, how would you implement minimizing the penalty of moving from one carrier to another?
I find it ironic that a UNION would have to take steps to initiate a benefit that every non UNION skilled worker gets by default.
I still feel seniority is a tool of manipulation and entrapment.
I guess people have to make a decision. Is it worth entrapment and erosion to have supposed job protection?
Complicated question indeed.