Wretched Wrench
Veteran
- Apr 21, 2003
- 1,626
- 12
........ as soon as any policy is abused, it gets terminated.
Yeah, dang shame. Easy and cheap in the short run, but costs the company a lot in the long run. Irreparable damage.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
........ as soon as any policy is abused, it gets terminated.
Yeah, dang shame. Easy and cheap in the short run, but costs the company a lot in the long run. Irreparable damage.
.
If your going on the ramp and seeing 3 people work and 10 play dominoes it is their 30 minute lunch which they are by law entitled to. I know, it's a shame they are allowed to sit for 30 minutes your non union job has forced you to go all these yrs without a lunch or break. Which I see resulted in to much kool aid drinking. I guess we must also blame the Department of Labor for setting some protection for the workers.
Some have gone to the DOL but to no luck, as they just look the other way.
BTW, it's the law that if you work for more then 6 hours straight you must have a break.
Although there may not be a federal law. I beleive many states have laws that require a min 15min break every 4 hrs.For the record, there is no federal law requiring that workers get breaks of any sort. It's a matter of employer policy and/or a contract.
Other than -- maybe -- CA, I don't think that is the case either. But if you could provide some proof I will stand corrected.
Meal periods was one of the original arguments on this thread and they are not only federally required, but also have many addittion state rules.For the record, there is no federal law requiring that workers get breaks of any sort. It's a matter of employer policy and/or a contract.
(a) Bona fide meal periods. Bona fide meal periods are not worktime.
Bona
fide meal periods do not include coffee breaks or time for snacks. These
are rest periods. The employee must be completely relieved from duty for
the purposes of eating regular meals. Ordinarily 30 minutes or more is
long enough for a bona fide meal period. A shorter period may be long
enough under special conditions. The employee is not relieved if he is
required to perform any duties, whether active or inactive, while
eating. For example, an office employee who is required to eat at his
desk or a factory worker who is required to be at his machine is working
while eating. (Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin, Nebraska Co., 97 F. Supp. 661
(D. Neb. 1951), aff'd 197 F. 2d 981 (C.A. 8, 1952), cert. denied 344
U.S. 888 (1952); Thompson v. Stock & Sons, Inc., 93 F. Supp. 213 (E.D.
Mich 1950), aff'd 194 F. 2d 493 (C.A. 6, 1952); Biggs v. Joshua Hendy
Corp., 183 F. 2d 515 (C. A. 9, 1950), 187 F. 2d 447 (C.A. 9, 1951);
Walling v. Dunbar Transfer & Storage Co., 3 W.H. Cases 284; 7 Labor
Cases para. 61.565 (W.D. Tenn. 1943); Lofton v. Seneca Coal and Coke
Co., 2 W.H. Cases 669; 6 Labor Cases para. 61,271 (N.D. Okla. 1942);
aff'd 136 F. 2d 359 (C.A. 10, 1943); cert. denied 320 U.S. 772 (1943);
Mitchell v. Tampa Cigar Co., 36 Labor Cases para. 65, 198, 14 W.H. Cases
38 (S.D. Fla. 1959); Douglass v. Hurwitz Co., 145 F. Supp. 29, 13 W.H.
Cases (E.D. Pa. 1956))
(B) Where no permission to leave premises. It is not necessary that
an employee be permitted to leave the premises if he is otherwise
completely freed from duties during the meal period.
Breaks are a common source of confusion for employers. As noted toward the beginning of this paper, the FLSA does not require employers to give breaks during the workday, but if breaks are given, certain rules apply. Rest or coffee breaks, defined as 20 minutes or less, are compensable hours worked under 29 C.F.R. 785.18, since they are regarded as being for the benefit of both the employer and the employee. Meal breaks, on the other hand, are not compensable, as long as they are at least 30 minutes in length and the employee is "completely relieved from duty for the purpose of eating a regular meal" (see 29 C.F.R. 785.19). Shorter meal breaks may be considered valid under special circumstances. The most frequent pitfall for employers is thinking that employees have true meal breaks if they are allowed to eat at their desks while answering phones, opening mail, sorting files, and so on. Such duties performed while trying to eat will render the time spent during the meal break compensable. Employers may control unauthorized work during meal breaks by the disciplinary process.
Then why not work an 8 hour day with no lunch period.
AArogant Airlines doesnt pay us for the lunch any way so why not just do 8 and leave.
I recall the 8 hour day being a strike issue 2 contracts back.
That's what we do at Crew Skd. But our shifts are set for that. We have 3 hour shifts, no specified lunch breaks or rest breaks. We eat at our desk and run to the rest room when call loads are light or get our partner to cover our desk when we are gone. During OSO or other high call volume periods, we sometimes do not get a chance to eat.
Now you are misinterpreting, Bear. FLSA defines breaks--rest or coffee breaks as being a respite from work of 20 minutes or less. And, it says that those breaks because they are to the benefit of both the employer and the employee must be compensed. It goes on to say that a meal break which the regs say should be at least 30 minutes long to be so considered are not compensable if the employee is not required to do any work during the period and is not required to take said break while sitting at the work station. The section quoted is simply drawing a distinction between "coffee" breaks and meal breaks and the conditions under which an employer could choose not to compense that time.Your interpretation is not correct. You are citing regs that DEFINE "bona fide meal periods," NOT saying that they are required. In fact, the TX regs you cite specifically state that "the FLSA [Fair Labor Standards Act -- the legislation that covers such topics] does NOT require employers to give breaks during the work day" (emphasis added).
0600-1400
0700-1500
1400-2200
1500-2300
these are the start times...yes it is busy first thing with the numbers being counted to see if the operation can handle PVD'S and Mini Leave
to see if option II will be needed . But no one should ever be rude it is our job to answer the phone and to be professional at all times.
Garfield. What are the shift periods? I called yesterday between 610 and 710 your time and the schedulers were grumpy and harried. Is that typically the end or the beginning of a shift?