Fatherknowsbest said:
PitBull,
I agree with many of your posts. This one is not one of them. If you repeat over and over that Colodney is a great man....does this make it true? I think not. There was a time when everything he touched turned to gold. But this is the CEO who bought 2 airlines and then didn't know what to do with them. Didn't know how to merge them, didn't know what management to keep, didn't realize which contracts worked and why, and which ones didn't. There was no meaningful plan.
You will never admit that the wrong turn the Company took, was under his stewardship. Many, many, many ex (layed off) and current employees know better. I have no problem with the fact you like the man. Stop trying to pretend all would be fine if he were still in charge. These are the dumbest comments you have ever made on this board in my opinion. I appreciate the fact that most of your comments are dead on. Two thirds of the employees that are left will never share your view. Should we put this up for a vote? Lets just stop playing the what if game. I would certainly say that he (Colodney) is better than what we currently have at the helm...he is still the one who started the mess that we have been in for a number of years, he couldn't even find a decent replacement!
Father,
It wasn't up to Colodney to find a replacement, it was up to the BOD. It was also up to the BOD to acquire Piedmont and PSA. If you remember, the plan was to make the airline bigger so there would not be a hostile takeover. Remember the "poison pill" theory. The Lorenzos and Icahns were raiding airlines and then throwing the carcuses away. In retrospect, we may have been taken over by Icahn, and we would all be on the "outside looking in" if we didn't get bigger quick. We were at war in IRAN in 1992 "desert storm" and fuel was skyrocketing. In addition Colodney had already put in 30 years and he was retiring. Most of the failures that ensued had alot to do with the economic times. When the economy was robust, U did exceptionally well, like in the latter 90s, inspite of labor costs and such.
Yes, I would like to take a vote. However, I don't know how fair it would be and the turn out may not be so good, as there are many new employees since colodney which started in 1992. Plus, many of the merge airlines never worked under colodney long enough to evaluate his abilities or lack of as you and I.
I still stand by my statement. A CEOs honor and trust is more important to me than successes and failures. No one has a crystal ball to know the outcome of decisions, otherwise we would all be billionairs now wouldn't we?
Say what you will about Gangwal too, but the man had honor and kept his word. As a unionist, that has much value in the arena of "good faith".
I don't want to rehash the Gangwal thing all over again, cause that is not what this thread is about, however, I'm a believer when their is trust among men (women), we will have successes and failures together, and we will pick up the pieces and try again together. That's a "fighting machine".
With this management, I can't go there.