Fergerson

[signals]

The GJ screwed up in my opinion.  If you read what the function of the GJ is they nearly always come back with an indictment.  Has nothing to do with guilt of innocence.  This would have gone to trial and let a jury sort through what happened.  From what I have read it sounds like the DA dropped the ball and never intended for this to go to a jury.

Were you ever n a GJ? If not, STFU!

 

[signals]

What you believe has never been of any significant relevance here.
 
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/ferguson-michael-brown-indictment-darren-wilson/
 
 
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/how-does-a-grand-jury-work.html
 
 
There were eye witness accounts that conflicted with Willsons testimony.  The GJ was not told of these conflicts.  Had they been they probably would have returned with an indictment in hours instead of taking days.  The court system is there to determine guilt, not the GJ.

You're full of $#!t. Again, have you ever served on a GJ? There were also accounts by African-American witnesses that collaborate Wilson's testimony.

 

[signals]

That's right.  Ignore the Supreme Court and a judge so that you can continue to draw your own conclusions.  Pretty much par for the course with you.

Hmmmmm...I have to wonder whose mirror is a conclusion being drawn? Only the others are hypocrites in a mirror.

 

[signals]

Read the case then open your mouth.  The way you do it does not work well.
 
Or the prosecution never intended to get an inditement.  No it is not.  Read the links or not.  Up to you.   Given that out of over 162,000 case in 2010 the GJ only failed to indite on 11 I would say that there is a pretty good chance that a GJ will indite.  I guess it is possible that Willson is just really lucky.
 
I'm going to watch a movie.

Here's a thought, NY isn't Ferguson. Sates, counties, cities, municipalities all differ in their laws.

 

[signals]

Here's a thought, NY isn't Ferguson. Sates, counties, cities, municipalities all differ in their laws. Can it be that the GJ helped prevent innocent people from being gassed o electrocuted?

 

[Knotbuyinit]

Speak to most LEO'S and they will tell you that eye witness testimony is usually unreliable.

Officer Wilson's testimony was very consistent with the scientific examination of the physical evidence. As you stated and as was the case here, many eye witness accounts were simply wrong.

 

[signals]

Speak to most LEO'S and they will tell you that eye witness testimony is usually unreliable.

So maybe you should turn to that dreaded book that you refer to as The Bible. MMLJ, or the Gospels were witnessed by four people who wrote how they saw it. Usually 4 witnesses make a reliable story. Just saying.

 

[signals]

Where you there? DO you have first hand knowledge that the cops and prosecutor weren't engaged in Test a Lying? 
 
There is a significant body of evidence to suggest that this was yet another incident where excessive force was swept under the rug.

You weren't there either so don't be a hypocrite. If anybody is being attacked, I would assume they would try to survive by any means necessary. Thus excessive force is a COMMON SENSE response.

 

[delldude]

Bullshit1
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/fergusonsign.asp

 
 
You miss this part?
 

Yes, I shopped this. It captured mine, and many others, frustration with this whole situation.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/fergusonsign.asp#vBmWZYKK8JAjEJo8.99
 

 

 
I sadly have to agree with the man.
 
http://engage.fergusonaction.com

 

[xUT]

 
 
You miss this part?
 

 

 
I sadly have to agree with the man.
 
http://engage.fergusonaction.com

I don't disagree, but there is a lot of disinformation out there.
Claiming he was a pillar of the community after robbing a store and strong arming the store clerk does not prove exemplary behavior.
The 'hands up - don't shoot' mantra has not been proven by forensic evidence and/or witness testimony. Yet the mantra is still perpetuated throughout the media.
As with OJ, it's not about facts.
B) xUT

 

[xUT]

As a side bar, the cop who chocked that dude was way out of line for the crime he was committing.
JMHO

 

[delldude]

I don't disagree, but there is a lot of disinformation out there.
Claiming he was a pillar of the community after robbing a store and strong arming the store clerk does not prove exemplary behavior.
The 'hands up - don't shoot' mantra has not been proven by forensic evidence and/or witness testimony. Yet the mantra is still perpetuated throughout the media.
As with OJ, it's not about facts.
B) xUT

 
The left has made  "hands up the truth."
 
Right out of the lefty play book  Rules for Radicals.

 

[delldude]

As a side bar, the cop who chocked that dude was way out of line for the crime he was committing.
JMHO

 
Taxes not coming in on boot leg ciggies is the most egregious criminal act in the new progressive city.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

As with OJ, it's not about facts.

Now your getting it. I just wish the libtard vermin in here could see it.

 

[xUT]

 
Taxes not coming in on boot leg ciggies is the most egregious criminal act in the new progressive city.

Granted that excessive force is allowable for the unwashed masses.
Dude did not cause harm.
Cops are excessively aggressive but protected.
This needs to change.
Refusing a search is paramount that you have something to hide.
GOD I hope that cops are not like the TV series where they do 100 MPH chases causing multiple accidents to catch some hill billy stealing a pack of smokes.
 
Cops feel that they are above the law, not all but most.
 
IMHO,
B) xUT