Election Night Results....

Eastus1: 1) An honest question: In exactly what circumstances were you ever a leader? An honest answer would both help the proceedings here and do you great credit.
 
Ms Tree: As if I have to justify or prove anything to you.

I don't

And again I dont.
 
Ms Tree said:
And you still cannot or will not answer a simple question.  I guess the answer is a bit uncomfortable. .....
 
Perhaps you can properly take the lead, thus proving your own worth, and finally answer one yourself...even if "the answer is a bit uncomfortable."...?
 
Since you couldn't/can't even handle: "An honest question: In exactly what circumstances were you ever a leader?"...Well, perhaps you should generously allow all others at least the presumed "respect" actually due your own brilliant "defense" there =  "As if I have to justify or prove anything to you.

I don't

And again I dont."....? ;)
 
EastUS1 said:
Eastus1: 1) An honest question: In exactly what circumstances were you ever a leader? An honest answer would both help the proceedings here and do you great credit.
 
Ms Tree: As if I have to justify or prove anything to you.

I don't

And again I dont.
 
 
Perhaps you can properly take the lead, thus proving your own worth, and finally answer one yourself...even if "the answer is a bit uncomfortable."...?
 
Since you couldn't/can't even handle: "An honest question: In exactly what circumstances were you ever a leader?"...Well, perhaps you should generously allow all others at least the presumed "respect" actually due your own brilliant "defense" there =  "As if I have to justify or prove anything to you.

I don't

And again I dont."....? ;)
I'm asking general questions about beliefs, not personal ones.  Sorry you cannot understand the difference.  I'll try and type slowly so you can follow along.  My personal life is just that.  Personal.  Feel free to ask me about my beliefs. I'll answer as best as I can.  Ask me all you want about my personal life.  You will not get an answer.  Clear?
 
Ms Tree said:
I'm asking general questions about beliefs, not personal ones.
 
So you're magically above answering ANY reasonable questions that might at all establish, reduce, or entirely eliminate your own credibility on issues you feel somehow free to speak on? I see now. ;)
 
"Sorry you cannot understand the difference."...? Seriously? I most certainly "understand the difference" here and will generously offer a basic primer for your own educational benefit:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bfe6CgYbH8
 
Ms Tree said:
And you still cannot or will not answer a simple question.  I guess the answer is a bit uncomfortable.  I do not think you need to point out anything.  Your rating speaks volumes about what people think of you.  I think the only one lower is World Traveler.
LoL.
 
I could care less what my rating is. I did not come here to make friends.
 
It really doesn't matter anyway, it is just the same 4 or so people that -1 me on every post regardless of what I say.
 
Ms Tree: I'm asking general questions about beliefs, not personal ones.  Sorry you cannot understand the difference.  I'll try and type slowly so you can follow along.  My personal life is just that.  Personal.
Ms Tree said:
........ Your rating speaks volumes about what people think of you.  I think the only one lower is World Traveler.
 
What so quickly happened, while attacking another purely on the basis of presumed popularity, and thus themself (instead of offering up any reasonable argument) to "My personal life is just that.  Personal."? Do you honestly base all "thought" in even your "personal life" purely on the popularity of such "thought"? Perhaps you should get out and mingle with society at large a bit more... ;)
 
"Ask me all you want about my personal life.  You will not get an answer.  Clear?" VERY clear, in that you've obviously NOTHING in the way of any experienced-based background to support the bulk of what you offer up as nothing more than necessarily now, just opinionated nonsense. I've often found that to be the true hallmark of the devout "liberal", so no worries. I don't despise "liberals" based on differing opinions, but rather on what almost-unimaginably-arrogant basis they can even conceive said opinions to have any validity. In full fairness; that holds true for me with any/all human beings that spout forth doctrinal absurdity without the slightest, real-world basis of any kind.  Fantasyland's "liberals" and/or any inexperienced and just mindlessly doctrine-spewing "conservatives" equally make it impossible to have anything less than full contempt for. Any person either thinks for themself and heavlly factors in personal experience, actual history and true human nature, or doesn't...Period.
 
While humankind's previously gained from embracing revolutionary ideas, that's not always the case. Adapting unproven social fantasies simply because they're currently fashionable within small segments of society has rarely proved any resounding success.
 
EastUS1 said:
 
So you're magically above answering ANY reasonable questions that might at all establish, reduce, or entirely eliminate your own credibility on issues you feel somehow free to speak on? I see now. ;)
 
"Sorry you cannot understand the difference."...? Seriously? I most certainly "understand the difference" here and will generously offer a basic primer for your own educational benefit:
 
 
Reasonable is a matter of personal interpretation.  Your interpretation is not worth a warm bucket of piss as far as I am concerned.
 
There is a great deal you seem to think you understand.  Obviously this is one of them.  
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
LoL.
 
I could care less what my rating is. I did not come here to make friends.
 
It really doesn't matter anyway, it is just the same 4 or so people that -1 me on every post regardless of what I say.
At least you are successful at something.  
 
You do not give your self enough credit.  [SIZE=14.3999996185303px]It takes a lot more than 4 people to get a rating that poor[/SIZE]
 
Ms Tree said:
Reasonable is a matter of personal interpretation.  Your interpretation is not worth a warm bucket of piss as far as I am concerned.
 
There is a great deal you seem to think you understand.  Obviously this is one of them.  
 
"Reasonable is a matter of personal interpretation." Really? Is it then "reasonable" to assert that there will be less light in the sky overhead after sunset? Is it at all "reasonable" to assert that, barring more extreme math theory, that 2 plus 2 will produce 4? Is it "reasonable" to assume that gravity will again work tomorrow, much the same as it did today? Will all of human nature be different tomorrow?...Or are all such entirely subject to "interpretation" as one will?
 
"There is a great deal you seem to think you understand." What small portions of the whole life experience/the world/physics/etc I've any knowlege of comes from some education of the human mind, but mostly observing the lessons of history and the abundant empirical data anyone gleans from personal experience.
 
"Your interpretation is not worth a warm bucket of piss as far as I am concerned." Most generous indeed, since I'd be unable to honestly value yours at anything better than a half thimble full of ant sh-t. ;)
 
Ms Tree said:
Reasonable is a matter of personal interpretation.  Your interpretation is not worth a warm bucket of piss as far as I am concerned.
 
There is a great deal you seem to think you understand.  Obviously this is one of them.  
 
I like this guy..
 
Wow. Had no idea I'd have to spoon feed you. There is a difference between facts not up for interpretation) and opinions (up for interpretation). Not sure how much more basic to make it. I do not find answering personal questions about my self reasonable.

Study harder and skip the Cliff's Notes.

And your point?
 
Ms Tree said:
 I do not find answering personal questions about my self reasonable.
 
 
That would be due to the inherent limitations born by any standard-issue "liberal" who has nothing but a big mouth and tiny "mind" to offer. No harm, no foul, as such is always expected from your sort. Thanks for the evening's predictable chuckles. ;)
 
EastUS1 said:
 
That would be due to the inherent limitations born by any standard-issue "liberal" who has nothing but a big mouth and tiny "mind" to offer. No harm, no foul, as such is always expected from your sort. Thanks for the evening's predictable chuckles. ;)
Given that you look to discredited quacks and the FRC to support an argument you should really be more careful about throwing stones in that glass house you live in.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top