Election Night Results....

[signals]

Sorry, I can't keep up on this runaway thread about the democratic process that has nothing to do with the Democratic Party.

But here I thought you either vote or shut-up. Now our Loser of a President, will represent the non-voters. After all, a highly intelligent dim-wit can perceive that those who don't vote are on YOUR side.

This political correct crap is really insulting the intelligence of Ms Tree.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/05/politics/elections-wednesday/

"To those of you who voted, I hear you," Obama said in his first public remarks since the election. To those who didn't vote, "I hear you too."

 

[cltrat]

let's face it signals the current POTUS is a narcissistic ass of epic proportions 

 

[delldude]

let's face it signals the current POTUS is a narcissistic ass of epic proportions 

 
Buddy, you remember this pic from real early in his term?
 
                                   

 
My first impression back then was we got a big phucking problem.
 
I was right.

 

[Ms Tree]

 
 
While always projecting your perverse, personal fantasies, and ever continuing to delusionally attempt others' thinking; did it not even occur to you that I didn't (nor could any sane person) consider "two quotes" as anything even approaching a logical argument? Try at least a class in Philosophy 101, and then get back to us all on how "two quotes" classifies as anything even remotely similar to a constructed argument. In your strange belief system; do you honestly imagine it the job of others to not only protect you, but even make your arguments for you?
 
Let's begin with the following: "You ignore facts and reality and substitute it with your own agenda." Umm...so exactly how do "two quotes" overwhelmingly manifest both "facts and reality", since I'll generously admit to some confusion there....?
 
If two, or perhaps even a single quote's now supposed to satisfy the structual needs of an argument...I'll offer one that, in my opinion, fully describes the whole "liberal" mind: "There's a sucker born every minute!" P.T. Barnum
 
Seriously; does that suffice as an "argument" to you? If not, then perhaps, using your rules-of-engagement, you should look it up and construct my supposed "argument" for me?...No? Is not doing so pure proof that you're unwilling to "because you know the reality won't mesh with your POV."...?
 
P.S Hardly a major issue, but since you've pretended yourself intelligent, and arrogantly insulted another with some smarmy "home school" remark...well...It isn't properly "No your not", but should be "you're" not. i won't even dare ask about your undoubtably inestimable academic qualifications though. It goes without saying that left-leaning beliefs are the highest possible hallmarks of both utter genius and a fine education, after all.

Thanks for pointing out the obvious Cpt.
 
Your
Your
 
Mean while, from the "irony of people who live in glass house dept."
 
structual  is spelled structural
undoubtably is spelled undoubtedly
 
And those are just from this one post.  You wold think that if you are going to criticise someone on spelling that you would at least proof read the post that you are criticising spelling in.  Just do your self a favor and go pick the lint out of your navel or play pocket pool or do what ever it is you old folks in the senior home do at night.  

 

[Ms Tree]

 
I understand that you're clearly struggling with all this, but kindly refresh our collective memory there...? If proved wrong, I should at least be made aware of when and how...? Btw: That should be "proved you wrong", since we're apparently addressing a fait accompli from the past. You were fine with "posted" being properly past tense though.
 
Once again: In your strange belief system; do you honestly imagine it the job of others to not only protect you, but even make your arguments for you?
 
Some suggested reading:
 
http://onlinephilosophyclub.com/elements-of-a-complete-logical-argument.php
 
http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/arg/arg.php
 
http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/vocab/argument.html
 
Last, but hardly least here:  http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201202/the-magical-fantasies-borderlines-and-narcissists

 

 
I think both political parties are currently just bought-and-paid-for puppets of much more moneyed and actually powerful interests. "Bread and Circuses" for the masses to be continually baffled by, and nothing more. Perhaps you should attempt a "new tune" instead...Anything including even a shred of "logic" would be a refreshing change.   Hey!..If I'm wrong, there should be sweeping changes to come in even just a few months...but somehow, I won't hold my breath for such. How'd all that "Hope and Change" really work out for anyone...except the corrupt banking/auto/etc execs that pocketed many millions of taxpayers' money for their utter failures, of course?..and wasn't that all done (more billions directly handed to corrupt business interests than EVER before in history) under the "leadership" of a way-cool-dude-unicorn-riding "liberal"...?

 
The quotes prove this statement wrong.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Huh?

That was supposed to quote Ms Tree.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

I would expect nothing else from you.

Never intended to win with East, lala or South. They don't look at facts so arguing with them is measly for sport.

Well according to you facts don't need to be backed up remember?  Isn't that how you told me facts work?
 
I can't make up my mind if you are a bad joke or a good punchline. Maybe you're both.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

How cute. Still trying to pretend you know what a fact is.

I don't feel like I have to continue this debate. I have already won. Anybody that has read your fiction for any length of time knows you are a liar. I will just let your record speak for itself.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

He meant me but he cannot even figure out the quote function. And you cannot even figure out his obvious intent. Priceless.

I miss one out of hundreds (maybe thousands) of quotes so, by your logic I cannot even figure out the quote function works. Another libtard logic based lie brought to you by Ms Tree.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

There is a certain arrogance on the left. One that is often didplayed in the notion that the average Joe?Jane is not intelligent or willing to act in their own best interest.

Communism at work.
 

 

[Ms Tree]

Well according to you facts don't need to be backed up remember?  Isn't that how you told me facts work?
 
I can't make up my mind if you are a bad joke or a good punchline. Maybe you're both.

No and they still don't.  Facts stand on their own. 
 
Your villiage called, they want to know when you are coming back.
 
 
 

I don't feel like I have to continue this debate. I have already won. Anybody that has read your fiction for any length of time knows you are a liar. I will just let your record speak for itself.

 
You cannot continue somethign that you never started.
 
 

I miss one out of hundreds (maybe thousands) of quotes so, by your logic I cannot even figure out the quote function works. Another libtard logic based lie brought to you by Ms Tree.

Were that the only thing you missed. 

 

[signals]

deleted

 

[delldude]

 

[delldude]

 

[EastUS1]

....Just do your self a favor and go pick the lint out of your navel or play pocket pool or do what ever it is you old folks in the senior home do at night.  

 
Well, my senior home's still the captain's chair of a commercial jetliner, so you're unknowingly committing a bit of overt heresy here, in that you're expressing wholesale contempt for the continuing certification standards of the very same government that you so mindlessly worship. Sigh!...Since I don't see any Kommissar nearby, maybe we all should let you slide on your momentary blasphemy. We all know that you would be the very last person to ever even suggest the "messiah" and his administrative minions to be at all fallible in any way, after all...Right?  Umm...btw; when's the last time YOU were "properly" certified by agents of the government to be both competent and healthy?....Ever?