----------------
On 4/21/2003 4:49:07 PM firstamendment wrote:
AAObserver
Since you know so much about the industry, why do you think 45 managers deserve the pension plan they have been promised by Carty? These managers don't OWN AMR, infact Carty doesn't own AMR. The notion that somehow magaement deserves protections to keep those wonderful minds is the biggest bunch of crap I've heard and your article seems to support the notion.
If AMR were to go Chapter 7, which it won't, or Chapter 11, which it may, it will be because of poor management and decision making AND by padding the wallets of upper management.
You see, AAobserver, this is the dirty little secret that is finally being exposed in the airline industry...Give you and yours big raises at the expense of labor and then blame labor for losing money. You see, blaming labor for all the airline industry's problems is as tired as those who take their hate for the world out on the industry itself, inparticularly the unions.
If you are a true observer of AA or the airline industry as a whole, you will know what a joke it really is to reward these great management minds so we don't lose them. Where the hell do you think they will go? I have heard the same BS at United and US Airways...Oh we can't lost those great talents...all those talents that know nothing about the running of the airline industry, are unwilling to be innovative in any productive way, and only know how to blame labor for everything. Give me a break.
----------------
I don't pretend to know everything about the airline industry. I do, however, know about business in this country.
The pension plan is not something they were promised by Carty. It was something they were offered by board after 9/11 in an effort to help keep them from leaving, and all it does is hold money these execs have already earned as deferred pay for tax reasons. AA certainly isn't the only company that does this, and it is not something that is overly extravagant. The pension setup protects a portion of these deferred earnings in the event of bankruptcy.
What so many of you fail to realize is that a struggling company like needs to offer retention bonuses in order to keep all it's management for leaving. Most Fortune 500 companies have the same types of bonuses for their execs. Delta has them. So does IBM. Without them, AA will never attract quality executive leadership, nor will it even keep what it has. Why the union employees think AA should pay significantly under-market for it's executive team is beyond me. Maybe you don't like Carty, but any other CEO is going to go straight for the jugular when it comes to AA's overwrought labor cost structure.
And you say AA won't go chapter 7? Don't bet on it. The labor problems right now are causing AA to lose millions of dollars every day by drawing out the bankruptcy/concessions issue. Right now, AA is getting the benefit of neither and is hemorraging cash.
When AA enters Ch 11 (which it will because of this), the creditors are the ones that decide a) how much the unions will get paid, and B) whether they value the AA assets more than the actual business AA runs.
At this point, the creditors could get more for AA's assets individually (planes, landing rights, etc) than they could for it's overall business.
Because AA's unions can't stand the thought of their executives getting the same perks that other Fortune 500 executives get, they will force AA into a Chapter 11 bankruptcy that it will never recover from. Mark my words.