- Banned
- #271
Because Section 1113 C of the bankruptcy code FORCES a union to negotiate or face an abrogation, where the company can impose a final offer.FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:
You are correct, US used chpt. 11 to negotiate with the IAM and other unions on the property concessions.
However, why would a union ever negotiate concessions is what bothers me. To have the judge impose the concessions is one thing, but for the union to actually agree to concessions with the company and then have the judge basically rubber stamp it - that is something that I would be very upset with if I were a union member.
Yes I know, all the unions at all airlines did it (negotiate concessions), but you have to ask yourself why would a union ever agree do that?
For example in the 2004/2005 bankruptcy we never reached an agreement for M&R and our CBA was abrogated.
Forced concessions are ALWAYS worse than negotiated ones.