eolesen
Veteran
- Jul 23, 2003
- 15,945
- 9,372
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
The concept of percentages are lost on you.
The concept of total dollars paid is apparently lost on you.
while the rest of us working stiff pay just a little bit more than that while making a whole lot less.
I don't know too many working stiffs paying out $2M in taxes.
Romney's $2M in taxes from last year is more than AA paid probably over the past 10 years... and probably more than a lot of corporations have paid.
Sure, go on about the percentage vs. the aggregate amount. Fact is that he paid out what the law requires, and didn't take full advantage of it. And Mitt has no control over what the tax rates are. That's set by Congress.
You and the other libtards so badly want to turn this into a negative that it's quite sad. The fact is he's paid taxes. A lot of them. He didn't game the system to the legal limit.
I think what really pisses you off is he voluntarily gave twice as much to organized religion than he did to taxes, which means people like you can't try to dictate how that $4M is going to be spent...