Glenn Quagmire
Veteran
- Apr 30, 2012
- 4,809
- 4,343
Dude. You are losing it.
Dude, give it up.Why doesn't your standard apply to the other hypocrites?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Dude, give it up.Why doesn't your standard apply to the other hypocrites?
Dude. You are losing it.
Dude, give it up.
Oh. If that's your standard for Romney, is it your standard for Obama?
Obama said:I know, all those large social, economic, and national security policies are minimal, especially when compared to the monstrous issue of someone's personal income taxes, but hey, I'm sure you have to have priorities, right?
- He'd close Gitmo optimistic
- He was going to reduce the deficit. wishful thinking/lie
- He was against gay marriage changed his mind. Good thing IMO
- He was going to create the most transparent administration in history. OK
- He was going to ban lobbyists from serving in his administration. probably a lie
- He was going to simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. I believe congress would have to do that
- He promised to ensure that 10% of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012. Good goal. beat it 14.5%
- He was going to demand higher standards and more accountability from our teachers. (remember the strike last week?....) Pretty sure he cant do that
- He also stated that the uninsured would get the same kind of health insurance that members of Congress get. (Congress seems to be exempt from Obamacare...) Congress passed the law. Talk to them. He said what he wanted.
Politicians lie. No big surprise. This is not just about Romneys taxes so please stop pretending you do not know that. This is about the tax rates that all of us pay. I pay a hell of a mot more than 10% in taxes. He is a multi-milionaire who pays less in taxes than I do. He pays less in taxes than people who actually work for a living.
It effectively allows the issue to die before the debates.
Given the way that the Democrats are responding by saying "he deliberately overpaid!" it is also going to make someone difficult for Obama to try and use the "he didn't pay his fair share" argument.
It's also going to take away any sympathy for trying to use Warren Buffett's secretary as an example.
The best he can do is try to call Romney a hypocrite for understating his charity. And that's a dangerous place to go, given how little Biden and Obama (and most other liberals) are with their donations to charity.
It will also probably help his likability scores. Giving to charity isn't necessarily looked down upon in the flyover states.
The whole "47%" kerfuffle has the media painting him as a soulless, greedy bastard.
This effectively takes the wind out of that, and in a rather large way. $4M to charity last year, and not for the tax writeoff?....
So what percent of your earnings do you give to charity?