WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #76
you can go look at the threads.. they are still here.Oh come on. If you've demonstrated anything on this forum, it's that you promote what is good for DL. So, I think the comment above is highly suspect.
Question: During the DL-NW merger was anyone on this forum deriding the advisibilty of that merger, as you do now concerning AA-US? I'm curious, as I didn't pay attention at the time.
Remember also that DL-NW was the first of the megamergers. There was honestly a lot more positive from what it would deliver.
I think you will also see that the biggest concerns regarding DL-NW were employee related.
The challenge has ALWAYS been that AA-US would find it much harder to merge up against established mergers from DL, UA, and WN. It is also true that AA-US does not deliver what DL-NW or UA-CO delivered.
That is just the reality of the situation, is a challenge that AA-US have to overcome independently or together, and gives validation to why DL, UA and WN all went forward w/ their mergers earlier.
You continue to be unable to understand that business is business, not child's play. Business is cut throat competitive.He forgot to add that this outcome is also the best that Delta could ever hope for. This way AA will remain smaller than DL, and hopefully they can eat away at US until they close up shop. I'm glad that the masses are finally starting to see thru his agenda with world domination for Delta, as I have seen thru this charade for quite a while.
To somehow pretend it doesn't happen at corporate levels and shouldn't be talked about here is nonsense.
I suppose it is more fun to bit78 about how airlines treat their employees, but it isn't the only dimension of the airline industry.
The only charade comes from those who are afraid to talk about the tough realities of life.
AA and US' competitors will do what they need to do regardless of whether it gets talked about here or not.