nycbusdriver
Veteran
If USAPA gives APA what they want (widebody protections), USAPA will get what it wants.
Ya mean no 777 school for me? :-(
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If USAPA gives APA what they want (widebody protections), USAPA will get what it wants.
That big guy's name is Neil Roghair. He is the lead negotiator for the APA. I also talked with him on Monday. He is crashpad mates in New York with one of my best friends (We worked 3 different flying jobs together and have known each other since Junior High School). Your portrayal of APA's postiion is not entirely correct. They are concerned about the seniority integration. Trust me....the APA would prefer not to use the Nicolau as the US Airways seniority list for this merger. The language in the MOU goes a long, long way in squashing the use of it. Who do you think helped come up with the language in the MOU as to that respect? I guess you'll just have to wait and see what gets used. You'd be amazed the amount of liability a group is willing to risk over seniority. But you already knew that. Remember, it would be a fresh new DFR case from scratch. According to the 9th and Judge Silver, USAPA is free to negotiate within a wide range of reasonableness. If USAPA gives APA what they want (widebody protections), USAPA will get what it wants.
You don't know the half of it, if you did it would make you sick, way worse than the old ALPO lies..
You note LOA93. Why was the arbitration such an absurdly easy kill for management? Could it just possibly have been the incredibly inadequate language contained, as well as needed language that was entirely ommitted? Sigh!...No matter, since this glorious and brand new day's dawning could never be equally twisted to management's delight and your loss...ummm...could it? You've previously assured me that no gray areas existed even within just one portion, but then found yourself entirely unable to intelligently argue in favor of your "faith" there.....and we're not corporate lawyers who's sole professional purpose is to completely dissect contractual documents and find and/or contrive holes in them.
Believe me, I understand your position here = "Move on". No need to undertake any such droll pursuits as reading, evaluating and actually thinking. Leave such tedious things to management's legal department, whom you've every reason to trust as honest people that have your best interests at heart. Blindly accepting one of the most absurdly constructed and hopelessly ambiguous proposals that I've ever seen isn't the slightest problem since all will magically be well regardless....and fields of flowers will surround yourself and the unicorn you're riding. Good luck with that, and I hope it all works out great for all concerned. Seriously: Good Luck!
Yes bean. Because web postings on anonymous message boards are used quite often in a court of law. Besides, nothing I've said is illegal or unexpected. Again. Good luck with your quest. You're gonna need it.
That big guy's name is Neil Roghair. He is the lead negotiator for the APA. I also talked with him on Monday. He is crashpad mates in New York with one of my best friends (We worked 3 different flying jobs together and have known each other since Junior High School). Your portrayal of APA's postiion is not entirely correct. They are concerned about the seniority integration. Trust me....the APA would prefer not to use the Nicolau as the US Airways seniority list for this merger. The language in the MOU goes a long, long way in squashing the use of it. Who do you think helped come up with the language in the MOU as to that respect? I guess you'll just have to wait and see what gets used. You'd be amazed the amount of liability a group is willing to risk over seniority. But you already knew that. Remember, it would be a fresh new DFR case from scratch. According to the 9th and Judge Silver, USAPA is free to negotiate within a wide range of reasonableness. If USAPA gives APA what they want (widebody protections), USAPA will get what it wants.
Yes bean. Because web postings on anonymous message boards are used quite often in a court of law. Besides, nothing I've said is illegal or unexpected. Do you think the APA wants to take a chance of a Nicolau type arbitration? Look at the widebody protections the east pilots got (practically none). APA is scared to death of arbitration. They dont want to go there if they dont have to. Again. Good luck with your quest. You're gonna need it.
You guys don't get it. USAPA is free to negotiate, but they do so at the risk of a DFR coming crashing down on them. I think AoL will sue us as soon as we put together a completed list not using the Nicolau.
The APA is also free to put whatever list they want to put together and I think they'll use the Nicolau to avoid litigation if their list is used. I honestly don't think the arbitrators are going to move away from the Nicolau either.
And we don't have a case for a DFR. We can file for one, but I doubt it'll go anywhere. I said this before and I still think telling the judge we're mad because they used an arbitrated award isn't going to go over well. AoL has proven merit and we're about to give them ripeness.
Nic4us,
We have sparred on things. We have agreed on things. But let me assure you of one thing. I know gunter better than you do. We have flown together. We have discussed things together. I can assure you of one thing. He is not an idiot and I would place anything he has to say ahead of you. You would be wise to STFU and listen.
DCA319, you are not fooling anyone. You are not an original US east pilot.
Nic4us,
We have sparred on things. We have agreed on things. But let me assure you of one thing. I know gunter better than you do. We have flown together. We have discussed things together. I can assure you of one thing. He is not an idiot and I would place anything he has to say ahead of you. You would be wise to STFU and listen.
We'll be in arbitration so fast you won't believe it.