Death of Saif Al-Arab Gaddafi may backfire for Nato

Heard more today....seems Panetta was running the show......Valerie Jarret wouldn't let Obama commit....reason for Obama dragging his feet was he was worried if something went wrong, it would salvo his re-election.......Panetta and Hillary ramped up the pressure......Jarret still wouldn't let Obama commit.....Panetta said OBL's villa would soon leak to the media and Obama would really look like a stooge knowing since August and not doing anything about it,questions would be brought up and it would bite him in the ass. Seems Hillary and Panetta pulled of a coup and launched the mission with out Jarret or Obama knowing about it.
Seems Obama is a stooge in waiting and Jarret runs the WH from what I'm hearing.

Obama indecisiveness why Gates leaving....may leave sooner.


Nice story up until u got to the part wherenthey launched a mission with out the presidents knowledge.

You need to know where the line of credibility is. I'll call BS till i see a credible source.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #32
Heard more today....seems Panetta was running the show......Valerie Jarret wouldn't let Obama commit....reason for Obama dragging his feet was he was worried if something went wrong, it would salvo his re-election.......Panetta and Hillary ramped up the pressure......Jarret still wouldn't let Obama commit.....Panetta said OBL's villa would soon leak to the media and Obama would really look like a stooge knowing since August and not doing anything about it,questions would be brought up and it would bite him in the ass. Seems Hillary and Panetta pulled of a coup and launched the mission with out Jarret or Obama knowing about it.
Seems Obama is a stooge in waiting and Jarret runs the WH from what I'm hearing.

Obama indecisiveness why Gates leaving....may leave sooner.

View attachment 9065

Luv U Man :lol:
 
Nice story up until u got to the part wherenthey launched a mission with out the presidents knowledge.

You need to know where the line of credibility is. I'll call BS till i see a credible source.

Obama's a sock puppet if you haven't figured it out yet. Somebody else runs stuff there, he's only the poster child.

I'm waiting to see if this info is BS or credible. It heard it on a local show.....Guy that does the show is still waiting to see if it goes anywhere other than where he heard it. Quite plausible though.

Monica started out as a question by Rush about who was the blonde going in the such and such entrance to the WH....and look where that went......
 
Of course there's no difference between an fair and a op that was launched by the CIAO and SEAL with out COTUS authorization. Utter BS.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #36
Obama's a sock puppet if you haven't figured it out yet. Somebody else runs stuff there, he's only the poster child.
Yep, just like all the other empty suits that 'served'.

I'm waiting to see if this info is BS or credible. It heard it on a local show.....Guy that does the show is still waiting to see if it goes anywhere other than where he heard it. Quite plausible though.
I am waiting too... :D

Monica started out as a question by Rush about who was the blonde going in the such and such entrance to the WH....and look where that went......

Bill was impeached, served the rest of his term and would have probably been reelected if it was legal. :eek: :eek:
So much time, energy and $$$ wasted by Merika over a BJ. :rolleyes:

B)
 
Obama's a sock puppet if you haven't figured it out yet. Somebody else runs stuff there, he's only the poster child.

I'm waiting to see if this info is BS or credible. It heard it on a local show.....Guy that does the show is still waiting to see if it goes anywhere other than where he heard it. Quite plausible though.

This is why I call him ES (Empty Suit)

This man is a scar upon the land
 
Where did you hear this? A blog, Alex Jones, WND? ;)


Leon Panetta, not Obama, issued order to kill bin Laden?

Was it Leon Panetta – not a waffling Barack Obama, supported in his indecision by Valerie Jarett – who finally ordered the assassination of bin Laden. We don’t know the truth of this. We weren’t there. But a “White House insider” quoted on Socybrty says the following:

Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.

There’s more of this astounding report at the link. Who knows? But it would account for why this took so long to happen.

Socyberty link
 
tactical_facepalm.jpg
 
An unsubstantiated report form an anonymous source on a relatively unknown website is proof of what?


Come on 777, keep up. It's a conspiracy. Facts and logic do not apply. They tend to interfere with the whole conspiracy thing.
 
An unsubstantiated report form an anonymous source on a relatively unknown website is proof of what?


We don’t know the truth of this. We weren’t there. But a “White House insider” quoted on Socybrty says the following:

Never said it proved Jack, Dude......said it was interesting if true..... :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top