PITbull
Veteran
- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,784
- 456
[blockquote]
----------------
On 2/14/2003 5:46:19 PM atc wrote:
I don't deny that David Siegel will ultimately be rewarded greatly (either here, or at his next gig) if US Airways survives. However, he currently is not paid lavishly by CEO standards.
Your claim that he, and management, only accepted concessions as a result of labor pressure doesn't pass my squint test.
----------------
[/blockquote
I am trying not to get insulting here, but it IRKS me to see on these boards folks feeling sorry for poor Senior Execs, and their pay concessions taking them from VERY RICH TO STILL VERY RICH! Let me give you a slight epiphany...Siegel is paid #5 among the CEOs for all airlines, AND THAT WAS WITH A PAYCUT. Don't talk about Harvard Grads, that statement and $2 will get you a cup of coffee around here.
And I'm not trying to get you to squint or blink. Folks that make those statments never do.
----------------
On 2/14/2003 5:46:19 PM atc wrote:
I don't deny that David Siegel will ultimately be rewarded greatly (either here, or at his next gig) if US Airways survives. However, he currently is not paid lavishly by CEO standards.
Your claim that he, and management, only accepted concessions as a result of labor pressure doesn't pass my squint test.
----------------
[/blockquote
I am trying not to get insulting here, but it IRKS me to see on these boards folks feeling sorry for poor Senior Execs, and their pay concessions taking them from VERY RICH TO STILL VERY RICH! Let me give you a slight epiphany...Siegel is paid #5 among the CEOs for all airlines, AND THAT WAS WITH A PAYCUT. Don't talk about Harvard Grads, that statement and $2 will get you a cup of coffee around here.
And I'm not trying to get you to squint or blink. Folks that make those statments never do.