- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #211
Thanks maybe next timeIt's spelled "bankruptcy"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks maybe next timeIt's spelled "bankruptcy"
Thanks maybe next time
This is certainly revealing of the competency and quality of the leadership in place at the CWA!
Josh
http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/12/cwa-files-nmb-petition-to-repr.html
CWA files NMB petition to represent American Airlines passenger service agents
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2012/39n009.pdfThere is no status quo for a non-union group.
There isnt even status quo for a newly organized group without their first CBA, Go look up AMFA vs ACA, Lee Seeham, lost this case and there is no longer a status quo for a group who hasnt negotiated their first CBA.
kept lookingYet there's no reference to it on the NMB's website...
http://www.nmb.gov/activ-rpts/od.html#2
And once again you post something that has nothing to do with what we are talking about.http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2012/39n009.pdf
This determination resolves election interference allegations filed by the
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO(IAM or Organization) involving employees of Delta Air Lines, Inc.(Delta or Carrier). For the reasons below, the National MediationBoard (NMB or Board) finds that the laboratory conditions were not tainted.
Maybe CWA can learn from IAM lost. It is an up hill battle with corporate America
kept looking
The CWA filed signatures with the NMB on Dec. 7 seeking to represent the AA passenger service agents, The NMB hasn't acted on the CWA petition yet.Tell you what, why don't you just post proof that the NMB is considering an election?
I'm not sure that it shows up on the NMB sight until it's assigned a "case" number (that's not the right word but some kind of reference number). That is the official start of the NMB investigation of a representational dispute. I think that if the NMB decides that there isn't a "dispute' - an investigation won't take place - then that is posted.Tell you what, why don't you just post proof that the NMB is considering an election?
So you post the names if it upsets you so muchWhat's the point of blanking out the name? Once they're entered onto the docket, all the information and their names will be part of the public record.
And, they'll be right there for all of the world, including management, to see.
Dumb, dumb, dumb.