Cwa Buyout Proposal
- Thread starter bagosh
- Start date
Airtran Payrates
Just got this from a friend. Interesting that even Airtran would top out over $3 an hour more than US ($13.10 vs $16.75) with this current proposal. What about the B6 comparisons? Now that its been made known they top out at $20, they too are no longer to be compared to? Guess Siegal should have picked a different airline a couple months ago with his rez comparison then ($9-21 joke) if they dont want to even use them now. Pathetic. :down: :down: :down:
Just got this from a friend. Interesting that even Airtran would top out over $3 an hour more than US ($13.10 vs $16.75) with this current proposal. What about the B6 comparisons? Now that its been made known they top out at $20, they too are no longer to be compared to? Guess Siegal should have picked a different airline a couple months ago with his rez comparison then ($9-21 joke) if they dont want to even use them now. Pathetic. :down: :down: :down:
networking
Advanced
- Sep 1, 2002
- 120
- 0
Exactly. This is the plan. More walkers....less buyout money/bennes. Let't just hope what goes around, comes around.WestCoastGuy said:
Dont call me Shirley
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 3,270
- 306
Did you notice that they pay a USD 0.75/hr pay premium in high cost of living areas? And more sick time than UAIR? I wonder what their health benefits are like. Probably good. Which might be another reason mgmt doesn't want to use them as a yardstick!tadjr said:
EyeInTheSky
Veteran
Dont call me Shirley I know someone at AirTran and their coverage is tiered between 40-60% coverage. They say it's awful.
EyeInTheSky
Veteran
Hawk you have a nice big office at CCY why don't you enlighten us with facts instead of innuendo?
TheLarkAscending
Veteran
Why don't you supply the accurate information since you seem so eager to chide those that post what they'd believed to be accurate; make an honest attempt to dispel the rumors of what you claim is inaccurate information.Hawk said:
You can't have it both ways, although you seem to believe that you can. Either put your facts before the readers or don't post "behave yourselves, it only upsets the children" hand slaps. Empty, hollow, and meaningless.
Do you even hear the crappy tone in your post? These are people you are talking about. Not "labor," some nameless, faceless blob of work contribution.Hawk said:
Words are extraordinarily powerful tools. In a company, they must be used to build people up so that you can have a team of people working toward a common goal.
What's wrong with you???
youngblood
Senior
- Jan 17, 2004
- 373
- 0
Well, well, well ..........usfliboi said:
A blast from the past.
Any MORON would not invest hard earned cash in a company that is so mismanaged even a 2 year old could do a better job. The company will bleed us till we are dry. Maybe you want to lay your head on the chopping block, but I am not going willingly. A buyout should have been implemented the first damn time they asked for concessions. Let me repeat - the FIRST time. If that would have been the case, maybe the third round of concessions would not have been considered. Oh......oops. Forgot that we're talking about U. Yep, third round was always inevitable.
your group gets an agreement with a buyout.....mech's get none...i hate to tell 'yall...youz screwed................delldude said:wake up and smell the roses......you think these clowns would actually give a buyout proposal??
we're talking concessions baby.......not gimmme's...........
Hello Newman
Senior
- Aug 23, 2002
- 376
- 0
Baby?????
