ChrisUS
Senior
- Aug 20, 2005
- 449
- 72
They keep saying how many retirees there are from the combined company. I'll agree there probably are quite a few. I'd also really love to hear how MANY of those retirees actually travel and with what frequency. Most of the ones I know, don't very often. When they do, it's something of importance for them, not just a lark.nycbusdriver said:I've been watching the videos of Parker'semployee meetings, and the subject of retiree travel keeps coming up. He gives the same excuse as always about why the retirees now come behind active employees. It is not a matter of fairness, per se, since he acknowledges that retirees have spent decades expecting one thing, then get it taken away. He simply says a decision had to be made one way or the other, and he made it. Given the huge number of retirees of the combined airline, it kind of makes sense, and it's still kind of unfair.
How about this compromise which should be fairly easy to institute: For retirees who stay until at least 65 AND have at least 35 years of service (basically giving their entire professional life to AA or its merger partners), why not let them in the same queue as the active employees? (For pilots who previously had to retire by law at 60, give them a bonus 5 years in both calculations if they stayed until 60.)
Bottom line: It really isn't fair to spend your entire life working for one company with the promise of this perk, only to be bumped out of line by an arbitrary decision.