Eolsen makes a good point. The real problem lies in the fact that this ''outrage'' is based on emotion and little fact.
AMR already had in place retirement packages for each of the executives involved. In 1985 the corporation, like almost every corporation in America, set up a program to protect the retirement of executive much like the retirement of all other employees is protected (by the PBGC). In this case, and the case of Delta, the fund already existed for accounting purposes, much like the retirment funds for many of you exists. What AMR did is put it aside to be protected so that executive wouldn''t immediately ''retire'' right before a bankruptcy to collect their cash right away taking much needed cash from the business. One big difference between this program and that of some employees is that it is not completely funded by the company. In AMR''s case, it is only 60% company funded. The pilots of AMR corporation have a similarly protected program that is 100% funded. Why is nobody mad at them? Hell, most pilots make more than the mojority of VP''s at the company. The lack of understanding and knowledge is based in fear brought on by unions who know their only advantage is to have the employees mad at the company. If the employees like the company, there is little need for a union. Kind of funny how things can be twisted...