JungleClone
Senior
- Jan 9, 2004
- 338
- 0
Age of the fleet is not the compelling factor. As I said, the airframe can be maintained and upgraded to fly for decades. The problem is that UA's fleet of B737's are old on the inside. So, regardless of how well UA maintains the airframe to continue flying, the interiors need major work. The longer UA flies them, the more inferior their onboard product becomes, especially in terms of in-flight entertainment.
Touting an airline as having the youngest fleet in the industry is not an effective marketing tool. Just ask TWA. It didn't exactly work wonders for them when they tried their "1 new plane every 10 days" ad campaign. Customers in general don't care how old the fleet is as long as the aircraft appears to be in good condition. UA's B737's are junk. The onboard product they offer simply cannot compete effectively with newer B737NG and A319/A320 aircraft.
Touting an airline as having the youngest fleet in the industry is not an effective marketing tool. Just ask TWA. It didn't exactly work wonders for them when they tried their "1 new plane every 10 days" ad campaign. Customers in general don't care how old the fleet is as long as the aircraft appears to be in good condition. UA's B737's are junk. The onboard product they offer simply cannot compete effectively with newer B737NG and A319/A320 aircraft.