Biggest Liars?

[townpete]

Okay, fine. "State controlled."
Doesn't change the absurdity of your post, nor my reaction to it.

q

How is it absurd?

They openly and regularly alter stories at the discretion of the WH and or Democrats. i.e. "Controlled". They have control over what is to be disseminated.

That's more then just "leaning left".

 

[Kev3188]

Those are black helicopters outside your window...

 

[townpete]

Those are black helicopters outside your window...

Welp at least you have something in common with the title of this thread.

 

[townpete]

 

[Dog Wonder]

Obama gets more in one cartoon than Botboy will get in his entire life

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3322628-155/pyle-chaffetz-in-line-for-a

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

 

[townpete]

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3322628-155/pyle-chaffetz-in-line-for-a
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

If you have to rely on politifarce for your argument....you already lost.

lol

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Because actual quotes from the candidates themselves are a losing argument?

You didn't even bother to read the articles I see, since Clinton, Obama, Trump, Chavetz, and many others are making the grade. It is the season where the biggest liar gets the highest polls.

 

[delldude]

Vote establishment......for more of the same.

 

[townpete]

Because actual quotes from the candidates themselves are a losing argument?
You didn't even bother to read the articles I see, since Clinton, Obama, Trump, Chavetz, and many others are making the grade. It is the season where the biggest liar gets the highest polls.

Need I remind you?

"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor"

Chappaquidick and Mary Jo Kopechne

"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

Shall I continue?

lol

 

[delldude]

True -           Trump-0      Obama-119-21%  Hillary-39-28%
 
Mostly True -  Trump-5-7%    Obama-152-27%    Hillary-32-29%
 
Half True -     Trump-13-17%    Obama-152-27% Hillary-29-21%
 
Mostly False - Trump-12-16%   Obama-67-12%   Hillary-23-16%
 
False -             Trump-30-39%   Obama-70-12%  Hillary-15-11%
 
Pants on Fire - Trump-16-21%   Obama-9-2%      Hillary-2-1%
 
Seems biased to what they choose T vs O vs H plus the numbers over time.
 
It would be nice to extrapolate and cipher out those figures into one basic context which equally applies to all three and see where the cards fall, but that ain't my forte.

 

[townpete]

 

[delldude]

Exhibit A: NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission
 
If you read The New York Times‘ story on President Barack Obama‘s private meeting with news columnists Friday morning, you may have caught one quote that made the President look particularly bad:
 

In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments.

 
The President of the United States failed to understand that Americans were anxious after two major terrorist attacks in Western cities because he doesn’t watch TV? It’s an admission that opponents are sure to use to make the president seem out-of-touch at best, and unconcerned about a serious threat at worst.
 
But just as the quote was beginning to make the rounds, it disappeared entirely from the the Times piece, without a correction or any indication that the piece had been updated.
 
Instead, the paragraph in question has been replaced with the following, which doesn’t appear to have any connection to the original paraphrase:
 

“Mr. Obama argued that while there were potentially threats that would merit the kind of investment of lives and money equivalent to that made in the Iraq war, the Islamic State does not pose an existential threat to the United States and therefore the response should be measured. The United States needs to take on the group, in part to defend allies in the region, he said, but it should not be an all-out war.
Moreover, he added, part of the group’s strategy is to draw the United States into a broader military entanglement in the region. A sustained but limited campaign may be slow and politically unsatisfying, but ultimately will be more successful, he contended.”

 
 


 
Here:
 
http://www.billoreilly.com/video/video-of-the-day?vid=375252227525859817
 
So is this another admission Obama relies on Fox News instead of daily intel briefings?

 

[southwind]

Exhibit A: NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission
 
If you read The New York Times‘ story on President Barack Obama‘s private meeting with news columnists Friday morning, you may have caught one quote that made the President look particularly bad:
 

In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments.

 
The President of the United States failed to understand that Americans were anxious after two major terrorist attacks in Western cities because he doesn’t watch TV? It’s an admission that opponents are sure to use to make the president seem out-of-touch at best, and unconcerned about a serious threat at worst.
 
But just as the quote was beginning to make the rounds, it disappeared entirely from the the Times piece, without a correction or any indication that the piece had been updated.
 
Instead, the paragraph in question has been replaced with the following, which doesn’t appear to have any connection to the original paraphrase:
 

“Mr. Obama argued that while there were potentially threats that would merit the kind of investment of lives and money equivalent to that made in the Iraq war, the Islamic State does not pose an existential threat to the United States and therefore the response should be measured. The United States needs to take on the group, in part to defend allies in the region, he said, but it should not be an all-out war.
Moreover, he added, part of the group’s strategy is to draw the United States into a broader military entanglement in the region. A sustained but limited campaign may be slow and politically unsatisfying, but ultimately will be more successful, he contended.”

So basically BaRacks saying more American Citizens lives, taken by Islamic terrorists on American soil, is acceptable! Got it!

 

[Dog Wonder]

Got it!

Really?