Light Years
Veteran
- Aug 27, 2002
- 2,878
- 0
Thank you, Micheal. Its not pleasant, change usually isnt but the accompanying growth is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ELP_WN_pgr,ELP_WN_Psgr said:Well, as someone who doesn't have a dog in this fight, maybe my unjaded outsider view will mean something.
The problem is not the employees working hard nor is it the wages they earn.
The problem is the basic structure and organization of the airline.
The question is whether or not the employees are going to subsidize the total failure of their management to adapt to the marketplace.
If I were an employee, which I'm not.....I would be casting a very jaundiced eye at throwing any more pearls before swine, ie....giving management additional funds to fritter away.
Before I would cough up any additional concessions, I would want to see some movement on management's part.
1. Reduction in the wages of manegement personnel. Give em stock options out the wazoo (if the airline survives, it's okay for them to get rich. If not, there is no reason they should continue to suck the company's teat dry while the rank-and-file watch their paychecks shrink).
2. Move the corporate headquarters someplace cheap. Yes, Arlington VA has a certain pizazz that Pittsburgh and Charlotte lack. But there is no need to be there. No need to nuzzle up to the CAB for route awards. If somebody from the company has business in DC, let them hop on a plane, they can be there in an hour and oh by the way, the company does have planes that go there.
3. Do something about the airlines basic structure. Talk is cheap. Rolling hubs, point to point flying, rational fare structure....you don't have to wait on the employees to cough up another gazillion dollars before you do those things. Wage concessions are just one part of the equation...and actually, not the most important one. Have evrybody work for free and your ASM cost is still higher than WN's. If management is truly serious about fixing this thing, rather than just forcing employees to cough up more so they can feed at the trough like all the previous managers.....it's time to let actions speak louder than wrods.
4. Grow the airline. That's the only viable way to get labor costs down. Nobody put a gun at management's head and forced them to give away routes to Mesa or other commuter affiliate partners. Shrinking the airline made all the junior employees go away. When the junior employees went away, the savings were negligible, since the high cost employees were left. Duh. The marginal costs of growing the airline are minimal. The marginal savings from shrinking it, as management found out the hard way, were equally minimal.
5. I don't know if the airline can be saved by the employees bearing the brunt of management's failures one more time. I do know that at this point in time, it's pretty obvious that employees didn't create this problem. The employees ought to be willing to try and save their company and source of livelihood, but I dunno...it'd be tough to give up more when there is no reasonable expectation that management would try and do the right thing. They haven't yet. Besides the nameplate on the prez's door...what has changed? It's still all talk and no action.
USA320PilotUSA320Pilot said:Boeing787, with all due respect, if you’re sick of my posts than why read them? Nobody is twisting your arm.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
........and neither do you. However, that is a rather pathetic yardstick with which to measure courage.USA320Pilot said:I bet you do not have the courage to quit and go find another job next week.
So you admit you made up the painful clause we have all been eagerly awaiting for you to explain?USA320Pilot said:I do not know a lot about the non flight crew contracts,
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot