Winglet said:
On top of the P.B., what kind of a salary is $41k in a place like NYC or Queens? I'd say it STINKS. Try living off $41k on Long Island.
And again, the 41k is the average pay of a topped-out flight attendant. By its own fault, MOST of US Airways flight attendants are topped out.
If the company was growing, this would be offest by junior employees coming in all the time at lower pay and higher productivity. This cycle continues and those employees become senior and enjoy better compensation and quality of life as a new generation comes in. This system works- see Southwest. You may ask, why cant everyone work evenly and be paid evenly regarless of seniority? The truth is the very lifestyle of a crewmember in thier first few years simply cant be long term for anyone regarless of thier age- the unpredicatability, the lack of a family or social life outside of the airline, crazy living situations, and physical and mental exhaustion would be extremely unhealthy. So the most fair way to do things is to pay your dues and earn seniority- one day you too will earn some semblance of a normal life to go with your airline life.
What has happened at Airways is that the system has stopped. Instead of growth there is shrinkage. Aside from the voluntary furlough program, the company has expressed no interest in working with the senior half on incentives to leave, nor have they expressed any interest in bringing back junior people. Instead they have furloughed exactly half of the workforce- the junior half. The conditions remain the same, with the most junior active employee working under those crazy new hire conditions, and the more senior enjoying more flexibilty and choice. However, the pay scale remains the same- 20 years is still 20 and 5 years is still 5 in terms of pay. This is where you see the conflict- US employees post-concessions make less than thier competition, same seniority counterpart (even WN), but the competitors costs are lower because they have a range of pay scales on the property rather than just the high end like US has.
Just throwing numbers out there (I dont have the exact figures, these are examples), but say with the current 5000, senior end flight attendants, the average pay was 40k (and again, its most certainly not even that high). If you had the entire 11,000 on the property (most of whom were under 5 years, at 20k-25k) your average would come down to the 20s. If you traded the active 5000 for the inactive 5000, the average would be the low 20s. However, you'd run into the same problem again once they get senior. The system was designed as a scale, and it has to be moving on one end or the other- if it stays static, your costs only rise.
This reminds me of when the US F/As were in contract talks in 2000 and that Katie Couric a*****e on the television had the nerve to ask why the flight attendants felt they deserved so much money.I think her comment was along the lines of "I dont know any waitresses that make $50 an hour". Well you know what Katie? I dont know anyone who makes a million dollars to get up early and talk about crap/smile/talk to a weatherman/get a colonostrophy. People like to throw around the high figures without understanding how pay works and how little flight attendants, and ESPECIALLY pilots make for YEARS.