str8 taalk,StraaightTaalk said:Actually, ...William.
To his friends, he is known as Bill.
Others respectfully address him as Captain Chamberlin or Dr. Chamberlin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
str8 taalk,StraaightTaalk said:Actually, ...William.
Actually, Veritas, I think you and Bill ought to know that, despite our differences, I have alot of respect for him. Fortunately, or, rather, unfortunately, he shows more class in his responses than many of the TWA posters on this board.Veritas said:str8 taalk,
To his friends, he is known as Bill.
Others respectfully address him as Captain Chamberlin or Dr. Chamberlin.
If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck ... it is a duck, even if it claims to be an eagle.StraaightTaalk said:Actually, Veritas, I think you and Bill ought to know that, despite our differences, I have alot of respect for him. Fortunately, or, rather, unfortunately, he shows more class in his responses than many of the TWA posters on this board.
It is truly ironic how, whenever somebody dares disagree with many of the frequent TWA posters on this board, they are called "arrogant" and "condescending." Quite frankly, you all throw around that verbiage so much that you have actually turned it into a compliment.Veritas said:If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck ... it is a duck, even if it claims to be an eagle.
The arrogant and condescending tone of your posts says it all despite your protestations to the contrary.
Thank You, Captain......L1011Ret said:Sorry STRAIGHT, your demanding documentation from posters courageous enough to share their opinions for better or worse has earned you the title.
Actually, William, it is their vain attempts at passing off "opinion," as "fact," is what yields the "demand" for documentation and proof. They have come up with neither, thereby reducing their credibility to zero.L1011Ret said:Sorry STRAIGHT, your demanding documentation from posters courageous enough to share their opinions for better or worse has earned you the title.
Jsn...I think you need to read more closely in the future. Certainly, I am no great fan of John Ward, or of what happened with the RPA. But, keep spinning your wheels, whipping yourself up into a lather. You are quite entertaining, along with woztwa.jsn25911 said:Straight - evidently you have a problem reading - never did I pass anything as fact. As I said I THOUGHT someone posted somewhere........... I even asked if anyone else read this.
You are just angry that I am apposed to what this union did to the f/a group. What I shared about JW going into management if he was not relected - was my opinion and I have a right to share what I read.
As far as JW - he has destroyed this job - and ALL f/a's are paying for it. How do you like making HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS less a month! Did JW take that kind of paycut. Is JW making the sacrifices of not getting enough sleep, not having a chance to eat, working Christmas, etc. I could go on and on......
I am not even encouraging people who to vote for. I am just saying that JW was working with the company and the AA need to have someone fighting for their work rules. JW does not have the experience for 20,000 f/a's. It takes someone strong to stand up and get this union back on the right way - that is working for the f/a's.
So, you keep up trying to hide the real leadership of JW - we can just look at his past and see what his future will be. And if you try to give me this about the success of a strike (years ago).......well JW just GAVE AWAY EVERYTHING - so, I would say that wasn't much of a success.
So, I expect your attack - since you are so JW! Bring it on!
First off, we can start by leaving the court cases to the judicial system, and acknowledging in public forums, such as these, that we actually have more in common than we care to admit at the moment.jsn25911 said:Straight - so glad to hear you enjoy my post.
Now how can we change this job and make it better for everyone. What can we do as a group to improve things for everyone.
Straight - Man I am with you on this!StraaightTaalk said:First off, we can start by leaving the court cases to the judicial system, and acknowledging in public forums, such as these, that we actually have more in common than we care to admit at the moment.jsn25911 said:Straight - so glad to hear you enjoy my post.
Now how can we change this job and make it better for everyone. What can we do as a group to improve things for everyone.
AA is the enemy here. I am not your enemy and you are not my enemy, unless, of course, you want to make it so.
Yes, they will have to comeback to the line unless they run and hide in a management position. If they do take a management position, this will just show they can't work under these conditions they put us in. I highly doubt any base chair will allow any of these sell outs to hold a position on base council. I also doubt the new leadership when they're elected will allow them to hold a position with the APFA.medr said:A hypothetical question. Let's suppose that John Ward and his cohorts are not re-elected. Will you see them back on the line as flight attendants, working under the conditions they ensured would be ratified?