And The Benghazi Cover Up Continues !

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #62
So hpu admit the "lies" you have been ranting about had nothing to do with the deaths. Has andone brought forth any proof that Clinton or Obama told the troops to stand down? I have not been following much of those story so I don't know.

Apparently "The Lies" I've been ranting about "DID" lead to the deaths of 4 Americans !

And looky here.............it's not just Fox covering this deceit !

"White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack."

And I'll repeat, "References to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack, were deleted" !

Not only did the state dept. lie but , so did the WH............... "The White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story."

http://gma.yahoo.com...05929.html?vp=1

Looks to me like something's sticking to the wall......................Barry-O !

"After the talking points were edited slightly to address Nuland's concerns, she responded that changes did not go far enough.
"These changes don't resolve all of my issues or those of my buildings leadership," Nuland wrote.

Give you one guess who the "Buildings Leadership", happens to be !
 
Terrorists in a civil war torn middle eastern country? Say it aint so.

I guess this means that Clinton and Obama are going to lose your support. Sounds like you may not even consider voting for Hillary if she runs!
 
They were talking points. Who care about that? Besides, the CIA signed off on those talking points so it's not as if the WH over road them. There is also nothing to indicate that Clinton denied any requests submitted by the Embassy as originally claimed.


Hell Issaa basically admitted that no new information came out of the hearings.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #67
Oh, so now your saying that the occupants at the Benghazi Consulate,did not request more security months before the attack?

Guess where those request's were sent.............."The Buildings Leadership", so in closing all of those in "That Building", all the way up to Hitlery, are responsible for those 4 deaths !
 
Political appointees at CIA signed off on the talking points. The career professionals didn't have a say.
 
Hey wind,

What about the thousands that died in Iraq cause of Bush lies?

What about that more diplomatic personnel died under Bush than Obama?

fdt8iw.jpg

Last time I checked, 60 is 56 more than 4.
 
Apparently "The Lies" I've been ranting about "DID" lead to the deaths of 4 Americans !

And looky here.............it's not just Fox covering this deceit !

"White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack."

And I'll repeat, "References to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack, were deleted" !

Not only did the state dept. lie but , so did the WH............... "The White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story."

http://gma.yahoo.com...05929.html?vp=1

Looks to me like something's sticking to the wall......................Barry-O !

"After the talking points were edited slightly to address Nuland's concerns, she responded that changes did not go far enough.
"These changes don't resolve all of my issues or those of my buildings leadership," Nuland wrote.

Give you one guess who the "Buildings Leadership", happens to be !


BOY,..........you.....ARE........ as DUMB and THICK as a FENCE POST !
Stick to what you know Best, like fishing for CRAWDADS, or eating GRITS.
Politics, or knowledge of such, is DEFINITELY NOT your strong suit !

Here's Why. (as I just posted on a similiar topic)
The ONLY thing that 'may' stick in 16' with the Majority of the (new) low info voters, ...is The issuing of STAND DOWN Orders, that the Military Commander over in Libya would ignore, If the orders were issued by HILL or Leon Panetta,.................BE----CAUSE...'they' don't have the authority to issue such orders.
Don't believe me, than go ask Rush BIMBO !

I realize you're FOAMING at the mouth to.....'GET' ol' HILL, but I told you before,..........you and yours are gonna' need MAJOR LEAGUE AMMO, to take H C..down.

NEVER bring a Knife to a GUN Fight.
Now go an catch a..... 'Mess o CRAWDADS' !!!!!!!!!
 
Hey wind,

What about the thousands that died in Iraq cause of Bush lies?

What about that more diplomatic personnel died under Bush than Obama?

fdt8iw.jpg

Last time I checked, 60 is 56 more than 4.
How many Iraqi infants died when Clinton blew up the baby formula factory. I doubt there were WMD, but yet we never really got any figures back then, or maybe the Iraqis weren't having babies.
 
Well look at this:

When CNN's Peter Arnett reported on the seventh day of Desert Storm that an infant formula plant in the Abu Ghraib suburb of Baghdad had been bombed, Washington was categorical in its dismissal. "It is not an infant formula factory," Gen. Colin Powell said, "... It was a biological weapons facility, of that we are sure. .

http://www.washingto...ignettes/v4.htm

http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-24/news/mn-1101_1_peter-arnett

You make this way too easy
 
That was also during the first Bush presidency. I remember the "baby milk plant" sign hand painted for the press to see.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top