j7915 said:
Ken, you are a true believer.
SWA's business plan has never considerd in-house maintenance. Just like JetBlue, Airtran Virgin etc.
AMFA did negotiate first a garanteed 38% and further a financial payoff for any amount exceeding 38%.
I don't know about the IBT, but the IAM and TWu considered all work theirs, and could therefore grieve, negotiate, arbitrate for any work that is being outsourced.
Will all the work be done in-house? No. but just like AA swapped routes with Eagle in places there is always the option, to get the work back.
j, I am a true believer in things that I find truthful and factual. I believe in God. I believe in democracy & I believe in accountability. All three I learned from my parents.
Am I a true believer in AMFA? I am as long as their constitution remains the tool to protect our profession.
SWA's bussiness plan has never considered in-house maintenance? That is true from the beginning of Herb's creation set forth on a napkin many years ago. But then why did not the ibt ever force the issue as SWA grew? Would not bringing work back in-house better protected SWA AMTs? Why does AMFA's opponents point to outsourced maintenance where they represent AMTs if it was never AMFA's choice to offer this option?
AMFA was able to get a cap at NWA's farmout capacity after the iam's negotiated 100%. Is 38% great? Well, not as great as 100% in-house but it is a start. Wording a financial penalty if this % is surpased is positive protection.
The twu has indeed considered all work theirs. That is why the twu did not care if push-backs, deicing and airstarts were given to the Ramp. After all, the Ramp is twu. Taking shop repair away from licensed AMTs and given to unlicensed people is not outsourcing because it is twu represented people doing the work.
I do not see any "option" for this work being returned to AMTs because why should the company give it back? As for Eagle getting routes I admit that for certain routes that can not be filled by an MD80 a RJ may make more practical sense. But at the rate Eagle is expanding at the expense of AA does not give me a warm feeling. Especially with the twu representing both companies.
I do not see all work being done in-house 100% at all carriers. But with the twu negotiating srp/osm language, ramp doing AMT work and willingly accepting concessions with no snap backs they are forcing other airlines to follow suite. If not for the twu's unaccountability and the other industrial unions fear of fighting together, (read afl-cio), for AMTs we face continuing erossion of our craft.
I believe in our profession. I believe our profession is facing a turning point right now. I believe one path leads to the extinction of the level of pride, respect and professionalism that our craft deserves and that path is lead by the twu. The second path leads to the ability to regain and restore the pride, respect and professionalism our craft demands. That path is lead by democracy and accountability and the strength to stand up and fight for what is right. That path is lead by AMFA.
Lastly, I believe that when all AMTs are in the same union we will indeed dictate our futures and the safety of our country's airline safety.