Anomaly
Veteran
- Jun 2, 2012
- 1,220
- 218
We simply followed the law.
BS, we will never know if you followed the law. You certainly did side step it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We simply followed the law.
"A group of individuals looking towards a common goal with self serving interests."
Isn't that what every "Union" is?
Do you now freely admit that the Teamsters will take away from the skilled to give to the unskilled?
Is that you point here, brother? Not sure what you are involved here for, but I have NO SHAME in advocating a group of individuals looking towards a common goal with self serving interests. In fact, that is exaclty my goal!
And what do you think every union is about anyway?
No that is an association. Apparently you do not understand the purpose behind a union, yet you want people to follow you?
Who ever said anything about amfa being a trade unionist? As was the case for the majority of SWA mechanics (but not all) they trew seniority out the window in favor of saving their own hides.
I am not sure i would ever even classify amfa as a union, although for the purposes of argument this is what the pretend to be. Amfa is truly an association. A group of individuals looking towards a common goal with self serving interests.
BS, we will never know if you followed the law. You certainly did side step it.
You certainly did side step it.
Teach me old wise one.
What exactly is the purpose of a UNION or ASSOCIATION if not a group of individuals looking towards a common goal with self serving interests.
An association will apparently step on seniority to protect the majority as happened with SWA/ATA.
A union, is an organization of workers who have banded together to achieve common goals such as achieving higher pay, increasing the number of employees an employer hires, and better working conditions for ALL members. A union would not and should not choose majority over seniority.
When do you expect the Teamsters to dovetail by DOH the UAL/Continental workers?
Date of hire
I'll believe it when I see it.Date of hire
BS, we will never know if you followed the law. You certainly did side step it.
Read the law dumb -a$$. It was followed to the "T". Just because everytime you post you get proven wrong, get over it.
Now here's another great example of a democratic union at work.
There has been some changes at the AMFA National Officers level. Why? Because at AMFA you have the option of voting for all upper, and local officers. Below are the results of the AMFA National Officers Election:
National Officer Election Results - 2012 Sep 10, 2012 - Posted by: Steven Nowak
The votes for the AMFA National Officer Election were tallied on September 10, 2012. TrueBallot Inc. conducted the vote and tally by use of the TeleVote® and WebVote® systems. The results of the election are as follows:
Eligible Voters 2581
Ballots Cast 673 (26.08%)
Assistant National Director
Aaron Hansen (Local 32)
Floyd A. Looney (Local 11)
Abstain/Blank
345
304
24
National Secretary/Treasurer
Justin Madden (Local 18)
Jarod Mills (Local 14)
Robert Wooster (Local 11)
Abstain/Blank
266
151
245
11
National Safety & Standards Director
David A. Brooks (Local 32)
Timothy Cullen (Local 14)
Fred Digne(Local 32)
Abstain/Blank
288
198
146
41
Region II Director
Jack Coonrod(Local 11)
Michael P. Nelson (Local 18)
Abstain/Blank
151
214
2
The following candidates were unopposed and, therefore, their names did not appear on the ballot:
National Director Louie Key (Local 14)
Region I Director Earl Clark (Local 32)
You can goto AMFA's National web site for the results and verification...