N617P said:
It doesn't make sense for a 401K match vs the IAM defined benefit pension. Most LUS AMT have 25 plus years. With annual pay of $76K how can you parlay a 6% match into enough cash to live off during retirement. A match of $4500 a year over 15 years is $67,500 even if you triple that your far better with a dbp. I understand the compounding will add to this greatly. But LUS 401K match was only 3%. In the 2008 jcba we voted for the IAM pension. We traded the 3% and are far better off for it. LAA had the best dbp in the industry. It doesn't have to be all or nothing. Give the option to the employee. Match or IAM pension . If your 23 and want the match great. For senior AMT's we could stay within the dbp. The IAM does not want your pension. Too much liability!
I understand your point N617P, here is the problem. The average AMT at LAA is 55 with 25 to 27 years vested, if
nothing changes in 5 years or so a lot of us will retire at age 60. We asked the TWU, IAM , AA & the attorneys
for the IAM pension plan to put it in writing that the LAA defined pension plan trust will not be transferred to
the IAM pension plan. The only response was an unsigned statement on a TWU letterhead pad stating they
have no plans to do so & one local Pres. who actually signed his letter.
But we do have a document signed by both the TWU & IAM that they indeed would discuss with AA once the
association is up and running putting LAA employees on the IAM plan, and we have proof the IAM pension plan
tried to move United Airlines IAM employees frozen pension to its plan but it was too underfunded and United
refused to fully fund it. ( AA's frozen plan is fully funded).
Nobody wants to see you guys change your plan but we will fight like hell to keep ours, even exchanging our
match for enrollment in your plan makes no sense given our average age. A lot of us do not have much trust
in the TWU International guys making decisions with the memberships best interests in mind.