Tim Nelson
Veteran
+1You guys try really hard when you take the wrong position.
The Judge ruled to abrogate the contract. The fact the Company chose not to do it doesn't take away the ruling and the fact the APA voted down a deal and an abrogation was ruled. The point being made was the APA and some on the Maintenance side of the TWU mistakenly believed the Judge wouldn't time for an abrogation. Which he did.
The merger, not the APA, dictated the change from 20% to 17%, as it created more value Anna made the bigger cuts more difficult to get approved.