767jetz said:
Sorry, but I don't agree. I stand by what I said in my last point. You don't seem to understand how the collective bargaining process works. The RC4 were elected by the membership, and as others have pointed out they
represent a majority of the pilots.
The process is set up that way for a reason. When you bypass the process, you negate your collective bargaining strength, and the union becomes irrelevant.
[post="176672"][/post]
Yeah, THAT IS the point.
I am all and fine with the process, and I understand it quite well thank you, but the process has to have a fundamental basis to make it work.
The company needs to think the members support the union leadership
If you were the company right now, would you...?
(Watching these three to four guys forced to resort to a roll call, not on the proposal, but to keep it from being sent out for membership ratification...)
Now, instead, IF a proposal is sent out to the membership, and voted down. THEN it is no longer just three to four guys voting against it, but the majority of the pilots.
Now as the company, you take the negotiating process more serious. You you "give" to "get" the required votes. You do not keep sending worse proposals across the table.
Yeah, I know the process, and if it has fallen apart to the point where a roll call is needed to keep the pilots from voting, then the "process" can only be salvaged by a pilot mandate. It has fallen apart because at the core of this issue...
The company does not think the pilots support the union leadership
Blah blah, negotiation tactics blah blah. If the company does not think you have the real support of the pilots, then negotiation tactics are merely useless games. The only thing that will matter now is a vote of the membership, not a million roll calls.
And what we have seen in the last few weeks only proves my case.