You let me know what you want me to do, and I will see if I can do it as long as I can legally do it.PineyBob said:This is a huge point on your part. We have lobbied them, met with them, badgered them, harrangued them with some result. Change is incremental and they are changing incrementally. Anytime you want to join and help us out, we'll take it whlinder.
Well the DOT says 1 billion a year in revenue is major. I'm not going to argue with the DOT. US should do a lot of things AS does. I've mentioned them a thousand times on here. If you like what AS does, have you mentioned them to your high level contacts?I guess it depends on your definition of a "Major" airline. US could do itself a world of good in observing how Alaska does things. They are very similar to US Airways in that they have a North-South routes structure. They also have successfully competed with SWA for many years. Primary difference is they fly a lot of EAS into Alaska.
I agree; any company that is out of touch with its customers will have major problems. US is out of touch, WN is not. As KCflyer has said, WN will repond to your letters and take action. Can you say that about US?Any company that doesn't maintain a dialogue with its customers will IMO ultimately fail.
In their current forms. What will you do if they change to something you don't like?A legacy carrier is better suited to my needs professionally and personally.