MetalMover
Veteran
- Sep 16, 2013
- 3,543
- 2,410
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea would have made more sense keeping the HQ in Houston in my opinion but apparently moving to Chicago was necessary for the deal. Of course now nearly four years later analysts have modeled dis synergies from the combination so maybe they would be better stand alone basis.xUT said:Get used to management movement, it's inherent in a merger.
To those that are affected, be happy it's 'not' Chicago like UA/CO did.
UA/CO People have to commute to 'down town' Chicago which is a sh1t-hole (IMHO).
Well we could continue the thread drift ad nauseam.737823 said:Yea would have made more sense keeping the HQ in Houston in my opinion but apparently moving to Chicago was necessary for the deal. Of course now nearly four years later analysts have modeled dis synergies from the combination so maybe they would be better stand alone basis.
Josh
xUT said:Well we could continue the thread drift ad nauseam.
JMHO, UA/CO lost a lot of talent when they 'forced' people to go to Chicago or the highway.
Several of my management friends decided to retire, or quit instead of move to Chicago.
Might have been different if it was Houston as QOL is much more sustainable.
Crap, just living in the 'windy city' and the snow just makes me chill, then riding the defunct train to down town 'CHI-Town' would be unbearable. Driving downtown is hardly an option.
Sorry for the thread drift...
B) xUT
Driving would suck, for sure. But riding the train is an easy option. And on the way home hit the bar car. Doesn't really sound like a bad deal to me, UAL picks up the tab for your train pass - from peoplei know who work therexUT said:Well we could continue the thread drift ad nauseam.
JMHO, UA/CO lost a lot of talent when they 'forced' people to go to Chicago or the highway.
Several of my management friends decided to retire, or quit instead of move to Chicago.
Might have been different if it was Houston as QOL is much more sustainable.
Crap, just living in the 'windy city' and the snow just makes me chill, then riding the defunct train to down town 'CHI-Town' would be unbearable. Driving downtown is hardly an option.
Sorry for the thread drift...
B) xUT
Taking the blue line from ORD to the loop is like a time warp back to the 50's/60's.blue collar said:Driving would suck, for sure. But riding the train is an easy option. And on the way home hit the bar car. Doesn't really sound like a bad deal to me, UAL picks up the tab for your train pass - from peoplei know who work there
It is the whole department. How many more could they take?130? Is that all?
I'm assuming he's talking about the METRA.xUT said:Taking the blue line from ORD to the loop is like a time warp back to the 50's/60's.
I ride BART and Caltrain in the SF Bay Area and they are "MUCH" better than the cattle cars in Chi-Town.
Bar Car? Man I missed that one... would have made the trip 'much easier'...But IMHO it doesn't exist.
B) xUT
AdAstraPerAspera said:Does this mean payroll is not going to be in Tulsa anymore, or is that a separate dept?
Gee, finally two people who get it....jimntx said:AFAIK, the only accounting function in Tulsa was Payroll. If that is correct, then no more payroll in Tulsa.
The Blue Line is the subway for city dwellers. Commuters take the equivalent of Caltrain -- bilevel coaches (with quiet cars) that are reasonably comfortable for the 60-90 minutes you have to ride them from the outer suburbs. From where we live, it was 60 minutes on the local, or 35 minutes on an express. Driving doubles the time, and there is no express...xUT said:Taking the blue line from ORD to the loop is like a time warp back to the 50's/60's.
I ride BART and Caltrain in the SF Bay Area and they are "MUCH" better than the cattle cars in Chi-Town.
Bar Car? Man I missed that one... would have made the trip 'much easier'...But IMHO it doesn't exist.
B) xUT