matika
Member
I'm sure this has been broached before. It's a simple question, with myriad answers (maybe).
Why does the company continue to focus on PHL when most everyone, pax and crew alike, seems to hate it? Of the many complaints I've heard:
* The baggage system is severely inefficient. (I can confirm this complaint without qualification. I work in PIT and I've had pax beg me not to reroute them or their bags through PHL.)
* PHL is highly congested. Misconnects are old hat. And yet it's almost to be expected that your flight will be delayed.
* The airport has a "difficult" layout. Hard to get from point A to point B at times.
Many more, but those are the ones that come to mind as I'm typing this.
Answers? Feedback? Thoughts?
Why does the company continue to focus on PHL when most everyone, pax and crew alike, seems to hate it? Of the many complaints I've heard:
* The baggage system is severely inefficient. (I can confirm this complaint without qualification. I work in PIT and I've had pax beg me not to reroute them or their bags through PHL.)
* PHL is highly congested. Misconnects are old hat. And yet it's almost to be expected that your flight will be delayed.
* The airport has a "difficult" layout. Hard to get from point A to point B at times.
Many more, but those are the ones that come to mind as I'm typing this.
Answers? Feedback? Thoughts?