legacy-to-LCC
Veteran
- Feb 20, 2004
- 778
- 2
your logic is really solid, be careful. good observations!I like what you've had to say.
I'd like to speculate a little bit and then see what you think.
I've wondered what HQ has been trying to do with the FFs, it seems they have been talking out of both sides of their mouth.
I think that they see more money through the "buying" of status method vs. the actual "butt in seat" method. The pool is expanded greatly (much to the detriment of FFs like you and PB) with an additional revenue stream. Just a guess and not to be insulting but they may see current FF benefits as too costly.
I know that each group lobby's for their particular position (which is only to be expected) however I would wager that the current idea of FF benefits will/has become a thing of the past. If this sticks at LCC it may become more common (see second bag fee) in the future.
What do you think?
america west has a long history of lowering service standards, and watching the rest of the industry "comply". buy on board is a good example. if assaulting fflyers is the next chapter in the america west management play book, i doubt you will see other legacies follow. perhaps it is just my academic background, but the there is a large psychological component to business loyalty programs--the airline industry is perhaps the best example of such. so, in my crystal ball i see real airlines continuing to compete aggressively and innovatively for fflyer business...and parker and kirby will continue to frolic in the love of cheap.