3 years till the next innauguration day...and the "Hit just keep on Coming" !

By 2016 there might just not be anything left around here.  Lean forward!
 

Attachments

  • 1524908_550067168422846_49729061_n.jpg
    1524908_550067168422846_49729061_n.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 199
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #17
eolesen said:
You are totally oblivious at times.

The GOP could run Ted Nugent and win after the Obamacare debacle.

If just half the people affected by canceled mini-med programs and other "non qualifying" plans vote against the Dems, it will be a landslide.

All those youth voters? They're adults now. They've seen first hand how they were duped. Especially if they're sitting on six figures of student loans and still having to live in their parents basement because they still can't land that great job they were promised under Hope and Change.
Never mind the F'n ..BS Eric.
 
Assuming Hillarys does run, AND with the exception of Jeb Bush, who 'may' run,............I'm CALLING YOU ...O U T, this VERY Minute,...............in front of ALL the folks here on the 'cooler, to Name......5  POSSIBLE REPLUGS who could beat HILLARY.
 
Feel free to start NOW !
 
( I got News for you , you damnn PHONEY,....You couldn't name....O N E,.....NOT one )   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Black Magic said:
By 2016 there might just not be anything left around here.  Lean forward!
We survived 8 years of Bush/Cheney I think we can survive Obama. Besides, it's the GOP's fault. They nominated McCain/Palin and then followed up with Romney/Ryan. How did they expect the moderates to vote?
 
NewHampshire Black Bears said:
Never mind the F'n ..BS Eric.
 
Assuming Hillarys does run, AND with the exception of Jeb Bush, who 'may' run,............I'm CALLING YOU ...O U T, this VERY Minute,...............in front of ALL the folks here on the 'cooler, to Name......5  POSSIBLE REPLUGS who could beat HILLARY.
 
Feel free to start NOW !
 
( I got News for you , you damnn PHONEY,....You couldn't name....O N E,.....NOT one )   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's two years out. Granted campaigns start a lot earlier now but there are a few out there that we know of (Jindal/Rubio) who could make it interesting and who knows how many we have never heard of.

On the other hand if the GOP goes with someone like Cruz or Ryan then we know how this will come out. If the GOP can figure out how to seep rate them selves from the TP/bat chit crazy crowd they might actually become a viable party again. If they don't it will just be more of the same BS from both parties.
 
Aside from the novelty of voting for a female President, where's the motivation for young people to vote for Hillary?...

I'm more curious to see if Obama resigns after the 2014 elections, which would make Biden the incumbent.

There's no way the DNC would let Hillary run against a sitting president. I know, it's just F'n BS to you, but if the mid-terms swing control of the Senate, being POTUS won't be nearly as much fun as it is now. It would be the ultimate back-hand to the Clintons.

It's my impression that Obama only tolerates the Clintons in small doses at this point, and if Benghazi is still being talked about two years from now (and I really doubt it will go away, given her personal involvement in the lead-up to the attacks, and her conduct afterward), I don't think that he'd be able to risk his legacy by stumping for Hillary.

He'll have to back Biden.
 
eolesen said:
.I'm more curious to see if Obama resigns after the 2014 elections, which would make Biden the incumbent.
Do you really believe that?

What do you read or listen to that gave you that idea? Surely you didn't come up with that on your own, I think you are smarter than that.
 
eolesen said:
Aside from the novelty of voting for a female President, where's the motivation for young people to vote for Hillary?...I'm more curious to see if Obama resigns after the 2014 elections, which would make Biden the incumbent.There's no way the DNC would let Hillary run against a sitting president. I know, it's just F'n BS to you, but if the mid-terms swing control of the Senate, being POTUS won't be nearly as much fun as it is now. It would be the ultimate back-hand to the Clintons.It's my impression that Obama only tolerates the Clintons in small doses at this point, and if Benghazi is still being talked about two years from now (and I really doubt it will go away, given her personal involvement in the lead-up to the attacks, and her conduct afterward), I don't think that he'd be able to risk his legacy by stumping for Hillary.He'll have to back Biden.
Not sure that age is much of a factor.

You lost me after the first paragraph. You are sounding like a fool spouting off about stuff like that. There is zero support for for that theory. Definitely not BS to me. Saying the earth is flat would be BS. Saying that Obama is going to refuse to leave office would take quite a bit of effort to attain the level of BS.

If Ms Clinton puts her hat in the ring for POTUS Biden could have the support from who ever he wants and it would not help him. Even if Clinton does not run I doubt that Biden would get very far in the primaries. I guess it depends on who else is running but I'd be hard pressed to vote for him unless I'm forced to vote against the republican candidate because they run yet another idiot.
 
700UW said:
Show us the lies,
 
What about the Republicans who said there was Death Panels in the law, thats an absolute lie
 
Top Ten Republican lies about the AHCA.
 
http://quietmike.org/2013/11/08/top-republican-lies-about-obamacare/
 
More lies:
 
http://www.occupydemocrats.com/a-complete-list-of-republicans-biggest-obamacare-lies-of-2013/
 
 
Mark Halperin, an analyst for Time magazine and MSNBC, insisted to a conservative news outlet this week that “death panels” were “built in” to President Barack Obama’s health care reform law, even though the notion had been repeatedly debunked by fact-checking organizations.
 
During the Monday interview, Newsmax TV host Steve Malzberg noted that the death panels “would be coming.”
 
Halperin agreed that it was going to be a “huge issue” and that the president had not told the truth about health care rationing.
 
“So, you believe there will be rationing, a.k.a ‘death panels’?” Malzberg pressed.
“It’s built into the plan,” Halperin asserted. “It’s not like a guess or like a judgment. That’s going to be part of how costs are controlled.”
 
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/26/halperin-tells-conservative-host-that-death-panels-are-built-in-to-obamacare/
 
Ooops.....
 
 
Update (2:45 p.m. ET): In a tweet on Tuesday, Halperin argued that he never said that there were “death panels” in the Affordable Care Act.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #24
eolesen said:
Aside from the novelty of voting for a female President, where's the motivation for young people to vote for Hillary?...

I'm more curious to see if Obama resigns after the 2014 elections, which would make Biden the incumbent.

There's no way the DNC would let Hillary run against a sitting president. I know, it's just F'n BS to you, but if the mid-terms swing control of the Senate, being POTUS won't be nearly as much fun as it is now. It would be the ultimate back-hand to the Clintons.

It's my impression that Obama only tolerates the Clintons in small doses at this point, and if Benghazi is still being talked about two years from now (and I really doubt it will go away, given her personal involvement in the lead-up to the attacks, and her conduct afterward), I don't think that he'd be able to risk his legacy by stumping for Hillary.

He'll have to back Biden.
 
 
Actually Eric, I have given some thought along the lines of a 'version' of what you suggest.
Just a different twist.
If Hillary runs, JB has got to be smart enough to NOT throw his hat in the ring for POTUS  !!!!!!!!!!!
BUT, consider this,
After a serious Pow-Wow, Hill/Bill...JB and his beautiful wife Jill, cut a deal where Hillary announces when she does make it officail, that she says up front, that JB stays on as VP  !!!!!!!!!!!
 
That would be called.................GAME.....SET.....MATCH  !!
 
Think that very famous picture of Hill, JOE and B O.. in the situation room, together, when OBL was being 'taken out' might be SHOWN a time-or-two, during that hypothetical campaign  ???????????
 
how about a famous picture of her lying about Benghazi or a few nice things tying her to the Obamacare lies?

lol you are really delusional Bear.She's going to be an old white woman in her mid seventies none of those youngsters foolish enough to be conned by Obama are going to be out for her.
 
 
Think that very famous picture of Hill, JOE and B O.. in the situation room, together, when OBL was being 'taken out' might be SHOWN a time-or-two, during that hypothetical campaign  ???????????
 
 
 
This one?
 
478swyu02393.gif
 
The out come is up to the GOP. If they run another McCain or Romney then the election is the Dems for the taking.
 
Ms Tree said:
The out come is up to the GOP. If they run another McCain or Romney then the election is the Dems for the taking.
you keep throwing that out there but I can't see Romney being any worse than the tool in there now
 
I can. Fiscally both sides are the same .... Stupid. Socially I think Romney and Ryan would have undone a lot of progress.
 
NewHampshire Black Bears said:
Think that very famous picture of Hill, JOE and B O.. in the situation room, together, when OBL was being 'taken out' might be SHOWN a time-or-two, during that hypothetical campaign  ???????????
You mean this one?...

Pajama-Boy-Osama-copy.jpg


That won't help much.

I don't see Biden being satisfied with a third term as VP.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top